books

Kangaroo in My Kitchen by Ethel Sloan review

I was intrigued by this book’s garish 1980s cover and its promise of “one American woman’s devastating experience of life down under”. 

Front cover of ‘Kangaroo in my Kitchen’ by Ethel Sloan

After flipping to a random page where she’s traipsing around town seeking out “dimes” for a washing machine I thought it might be a Karen-esque sort of opinion piece from an entitled person who came to Australia expecting it to be exactly like America.

But what actually is is a little more insightful.

What reviews that there are online comment say “nasty, vicious diatribe against Australia and its people, particularly the women, by a privileged American woman who clearly did not wish to be there”.

It is all these things, but that doesn’t make it a bad book. 

I read in a couple of hours in between other things. 

It’s insightful because it’s not viewing Sydney or moving to Australia through rose-tinted glasses “not even a pinkish hue” as the blurb says.

And this less than rosy perspective is what makes it interesting. There are likely a lot of perspectives of people moving to Australia which are positive, in video or audio mediums those would be the ones that have been preserved. 

But this more critical perspective probably only lives in the letter pages of magazines, letters to family and friends, and perhaps the occasional letter to the editor in a small newspaper. 

Images (aside from the covers) are from Wikimedia Commons from 1970/1971, and one from 1969, to illustrate the environment she probably would have seen.


It’s 1970/71.

Ethel Sloan’s husband Bernard (Bernie to Ethel) has been offered a 2 year placement in Australia with his advertising company. They’re sending him out to Australia to “Americanize” the creative department in Sydney.

Ethel explains that Bernie’s been with the agency for 10 years and she thinks this 2 year move is a chance for him to try something new. Ethel isn’t a fan of new things. 

Ethel by her own admission is happy with a boring life, a samey life, the same discussions, visiting the same places, same friends and parties etc. She’s got her group of friends around her. 

She’s just had their house repainted and got the furnishing and layout just as she wanted it and the bathroom leak has been fixed. Plus they’ve just got new whitegoods!

It’s all just…nice.

And now Bernie is talking about going to Australia for 2 years?!

One of Ethel’s questions in the early chapter of the book was “what about tennis” to which her husband challenges “you think there’ll be a shortage of tennis in Australia?”

This is weirdly something which will crop up later in the book.

What’s interesting in the following couple of chapters in the lead up to the move is the lack of ‘information availability’ as I came to think of it as I read through this thin tome. 

It’s something I noticed reading it from a 21st century perspective, and something I’ve not really noticed reading other history books which are usually published in the last 10 years or whatever looking back rather than a contemporary account.

Ethel doesn’t know what to expect, the information she has comes from the World Book Encyclopedia and her friends.

And the brochures about Australia which simply adds to her concerns / confusion they show surfing but also skiing, she takes many suitcases including her ski gear because she thinks she’ll be able to go from the beach to the slopes regularly (aside from one holiday away it doesn’t seem like she escapes Sydney much). 

The weather in general seems to fill her with much angst, and no one including the company moving them to Australia seems to tell her what to expect.

She speaks to several people who give her conflicting information; it’s warm, it’s cold etc, leave your fur coat at home the Sydney weather is lovely, but you might need it, you’ll freeze at night. 

This latter one does pan out to be true.

She introduces us to her friends who are fine, if unadventurous. 

Waikiki, beach and high rise hotels; Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii. August 1970. File:Hawaii, United States (28252953655).jpg. (2022, August 12). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 05:48, June 9, 2023 from link. Author: Urbain J. Kinet

But she also paints them as widely read / widely informed, especially compared to Australian women. 

The actual travel to Australia Bernie turns it into an extended holiday, first they’re in Maui (rather than Honolulu) which Ethel likens to Georgia.

What contemporary photos I could find from a quick search for both these locations and that Ethel describes it as being mostly under construction (they also stayed in one of the older hotels) I can imagine Ethel’s disappointment.

On from there they go to Tahiti and New Zealand, in the latter she enjoys herself, seeing the natural wonders it has to offer, seeing the sheep that look like fluffy clouds. They go mountain climbing and a policeman on a motorcycle escorts them to the zoo after they get lost, and they enjoy sulphur baths and see a power plant that doesn’t use any oil. 

I suspect if Ethel and Bernie had moved to New Zealand in the 1970s instead of Australia in the 1970s she might have written a more positive book than this one.

Upon arriving in Australia, or just as the plane is getting ready to land Ethel’s angst of appearances rises up

Upon hearing the local manager for the advertising agency would be meeting them at the airport she is understandably anxious, asking Bernie why he didn’t tell her?

“He had the gall to ask me what difference it made. What difference? My hair was a disaster, my clothes looked as if they have been squeezed into suitcases, the boys looked like urchins, we all looked like refugees, and he wanted to know what difference it made.”

This does come off as a bit dramatic, but I think her anxieties are real, and she’s just moved across the globe and her husband has been less than honest with her. His boss meeting them at the airport is not exactly the way Ethel would want the first meeting to happen.

Tom Middleton, the manager of the Sydney agency meets them at the airport.

Upon seeing the Australian men, women and their children waiting for Ethel and Bernie (and their two kids) at the airport terminal Ethel observes they all look like they’re from the 1950s. 

Which is an interesting observation, there’s often accounts of people saying in the past and even recent past that Australia feels like it’s 10 years behind the rest of the world. And in the 1970s coming from the US to Sydney it probably felt like a bit of a time jump in difference. 

Expressway, Woolomolloo (1970). File:70-755 Woolomolloo, Sydney 1970 (51217728742).jpg. (2023, June 3). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 05:38, June 9, 2023 from link. Author: wilford peloquin

The drive from Sydney Airport through the suburbs and into the CBD itself is less inspiring for Ethel she comments “not a kangaroo or gumtree in sight”.

She’s transported in a limousine with the Janice the wife of Tom and her kids (Paul and Steven). Bernie’s off with Tom Middleton.

Crossing the harbour bridge Ethel mentions that a bridge in Melbourne (the West Gate) collapsed recently. 

They’re then taken to some apartments after exiting at Kirribilli. 

First thing her oldest remarks on is how cold it is. Which is weird as everyone’s in flowery dresses at the airport. 

And Ethel remarks on the blue skies and sunshine as she’s driven out to their first house.

Janice has helpfully filled the kitchen with the basics in the fridge; milk, butter, orange cordial, sweet cream, eggs and lamb chops (which were stamped with 39 cents a pound). The cupboards held instant coffee, loose tea, bread, Weet-Bix and Vegemite - which Ethel describes as “a mouth burning vegetable extract which Australians smeared on their bread”.

Janice also brings out a quart of Scotch which they get stuck into waiting for the men to arrive.

As they go to bed on their first night in Sydney they both change into their nightclothes remarking how freezing it is. 

It seems they arrived in October 1970 or possibly 1971, (based on the references to the West Gate collapse) being a thing of conversation I'm considering it October 1970.

Looking at the Bureau of Meteorology’s monthly climate statistics for that era in Sydney the maximum mean temperature for October 1970 was 23.6ºC and the minimum mean was 13.6ºC. So while it was cool it wasn't freezing, even drilling down to a day-by-day data level it was only ever just below 10ºC. Perhaps it was just unexpectedly cooler than Ethel had been expecting?

I know Australian houses especially of that era didn’t have the greatest of insulation, but it’s still an odd observation. Unless (as Ethel seemed to lament often) she was expecting heating/cooling in the house to keep it at an even temperature. 

Manly, Sydney (1970). File:70-757 Manly, Sydney 1970 (51218653178).jpg. (2023, June 3). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 05:40, June 9, 2023 from link. Author: wilford peloquin

Ethel gets a Mini Minor to drive around in, apparently that’s as much as they think women can handle, and she starts looking at real estate adverts. 

She also gets her kids enrolled in school and faces the public school system where her kids get the cane, it doesn’t go well.

Apparently her kids in the US went to a school with a TV studio and pottery kiln. 

While at the first school she sends her kids to, they’re expected to go across the road to the milk bar for lunch and they’re given free “curdled milk” twice a day.

That night Ethel goes home and cries about all the Australian kids who go to school to learn and instead are “were treated as animals to be tamed”. 

Again I wonder if this is hyperbole or genuine concern / culture shock for Ethel. It’s certainly insightful regardless. 

She remarks “We had moved not only to another continent, but another century.”

Then she tries the private schools:

  • Knox is booked out till 1984

  • Barker has forty-five children to a classroom

  • Pittwater drilled boys daily and sent them on survival weekends

  • "Progressive Wahroonga taught the boys sewing and the teachers wore saris"

  • "Masada was the nearest thing to an American school"

Eventually some Australians recommend the “avant-garde” Sydenham.

From there the book is about her settling in, if that is how to describe it into her life in Australia. 

Eventually after looking around Ethel finds a house, it’s a battle-axe block in Vaulcluse.

81a Kurrakirri Avenue, Vaucluse to be exact. 

Australia Square, Sydney (1970). File:70-783 Australia Square Sydney 1970 (51219510295).jpg. (2023, June 3). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 05:43, June 9, 2023 from link. Author: wilford peloquin

It doesn’t exist. Googling it was the first thing I did when I saw it written in the form of a letter addressed to Ethel. The road doesn’t even exist disappointingly.

But there’s enough detail about the house, the area and the people around that it definitely existed somewhere in Vaucluse.

Ethel goes on a hunt for tennis courts, finding them all booked out, but does eventually find somewhere to play.

The most interesting thing is that in these games the women going are going to mostly socialise, the tennis is just a framing for them to do so.

At the break they bring out the tea, scones, jam and cakes etc.

Meanwhile Ethel sits to the side with her yogurt, fruit and vegetables. 

This is one of the interesting insights in the book from a contemporary reader looking back. It was very modern of Ethel, being 39-40. She was fit, eating healthily (she even laments later when she hurts her back and starts on the valium) that she was putting on weight.

When she speaks to her neighbour (Kath) who sits by the pool tanning and smoking, Kath muses of herself that she needs to go on a diet for the coming season of socialising with her husband.

Ethel corrects her and says she can’t just diet she needs to exercise, something Kath seems surprised by the even concept of.

Again it’s this little insight into Ethel, that kinda reveals a lot.

Kings Cross, Sydney (1970). File:70-631 Kings Cross, Sydney 1970 (51218652878).jpg. (2023, June 3). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 05:45, June 9, 2023 from link. Author: wilford peloquin

She’s focused on her health, and when she injures herself even the doctors remark on how good she looks for 40, that she wasn’t one the “wrinkles” as Ethel describes the women of similar age to her that have been in the sun.

She didn’t have any cancers “burned off” as those of the other wives of the company men have. 

Ethel laments the lack of a PTA (Parents and Teachers Association) as that was where she did a lot of socialising and work. Instead she has to work in the tuckshop along with the other well off ladies who arrive in Mercedes, Volvos and Jaguars.

One of the people (or rather one of the kids her child meets) invites him to a birthday, their father’s name is Sir Whitlam Malcomb, which is definitely a made up name. Ethel describes him as newspaper, magazine and television tycoon.

I’m wondering if this was Kerry Packer?

There’s not that many newspaper, magazine and television tycoons who’d be around in 1970s Sydney.

Their house on Kurrakirri Avenue gets burgled at least four times, and while they do install an alarm it doesn’t really deter people. 

By the end of her two years also her Mini gets stolen.

If this is true, and it’d be weird for her to add in this to colour up her story, I can appreciate the trauma she feels of this frequently happening.

They go on a holiday to Alice Springs, there Ethel observes it looks like California because it was built for the American missile base. She sees her first “real” (ie American) supermarket. 

There’s air conditioning here and there.

During this trip Ethel does wonder some questions regarding "Aboriginal peoples", whom she and her children wanted to see. They’re told if they want to see them in their “natural state” they would need to go to Arnhem Land.

Uluru, 1969. (Couldn’t find any 1970 images)

File:69-1263 Ayers Rock, Australia 1969 (51215930168).jpg. (2023, June 2). Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved 05:56, June 9, 2023 from link. Author: wilford peloquin

They visit a cattle station in Ross River, they have an adventure to get to Uluru (or Ayres Rock / the Rock as Ethel describes it).

Out of everything in this book chapter 20 detailing her trip is possibly the most detailed. It’s got the most observations packed in, and if I’m honest I skimmed it before re-reading it while preparing to write this up.

In the end Ethel doesn’t feel a lot for Australia, when asked when she returns to the US was she glad they had done it?

The answer was yes, because it made her more of a patriot, made her appreciate all the advancements and everything that USA had. 

It’s…an interesting observation and I can sort of see why this book annoyed a lot of people who read it.

Back cover of ‘Kangaroo in my Kitchen’ by Ethel Sloan

I do kinda feel for Ethel, I think people who read this book ignored the trauma and anxiety she felt moving to Australia without a lot of assistance. Assistance the company had promised her and her husband which didn’t materialise. And all without much of a safety net. 

Information availability is this concept I keep thinking of when musing on this book. 

That she didn’t have a lot of easy available information to access to salve some of these concerns she had. Just an out of date World Book Encyclopedia (from probably 1968 with maybe a year in review update for 1969) along with a mix of local newspapers and various people’s opinions. 

Which I guess was what was available then.

I think it’s a great insight into one person’s experience.

I don’t know why it was published or how she got it published, but it’s been preserved as having been published.

It’s a decent enough read, some insightful observations and you can read it in a short afternoon.

Favourite Doctors

As we barrel towards the 23rd November with the 50th anniversary of Doctor Who, the question of ‘who’s your favourite Doctor’ will always come up when talking with people. Those who are fans or even those who have mild interest. Everyone will have a favourite.

My answer to the question is a little more in depth than others, probably, because I’ve been a fan for a while, during the 90s when it wasn’t so friendly to be a fan of a show that wasn’t even on any more.

‘My Doctor’, the one who I watched on TV was Sylvester McCoy, the Seventh Doctor. He was all mysterious, teasing Davros about rice pudding and facing evil from the dawn of time. All the while making Ace face her fears and playing spoons.

My favourite Doctor for his on screen portrayal is however Jon Pertwee, the Third Doctor. He’s just got a something, it’s said in various press that Tom Baker believed he was the Doctor and would often do stuff interviews in-character. But Jon Pertwee, as scientific advisor to UNIT and beyond after that had something of the scientist to him. He was a bit eccentric, he’s got the Venusian aikido moves and he had lots of gadgets. He too also acted like the Doctor at interviews and other things.

The Virgin New Adventures, a book series that continued on from the TV series after it finished in 1989 made me a fan of the Seventh Doctor. In prose form his character became more detailed, more interesting. But I would say I am more a fan of that era, rather than that Doctor. It’s not, in this case about the Doctor but the era he’s a part of, and those books published from 1991 to 1997 are some of my favourite stories and the series as a whole was brilliant and made me think of Doctor Who in a different way. They were also the only new long form prose stories being published during the ‘Wilderness Years’ - the time when there wasn’t any Doctor Who being produced for TV.

On audio meanwhile, the stories produced by Big Finish Productions beginning in 1999, my favourite Doctor from their stories is Colin Baker’s Sixth Doctor or ‘old Sixie’ as he refers to his Doctor as.
The Sixth Doctor didn’t get a great run on TV, a fairly grumpy occasionally violent Doctor, he was given a new and fresh perspective in Big Finish’s audio stories. Big Finish and Colin Baker have made me love the Sixth Doctor. It is the Sixth Doctor stories I enjoy the most listening to from Big Finish.

The Eighth Doctor deserves special mention for being my favourite Doctor over multiple mediums, in audio, prose and comic he is a favourite of mine. In the BBC Books, which like the Virgin New Adventures continued the Eighth Doctor’s story after the TV movie in 1996. The audios produced by Big Finish began in 2001 and the comics published by Doctor Who Magazine began shortly after the TV movie.
Considering the writers only had one story to draw inspiration from there is a remarkably strong character of the Doctor in these different mediums. His character gets developed and changed, but there’s still something uniquely Eighth Doctor-y about him, and things that referenced back to the TVM.
In the recent The Night of the Doctor Paul McGann’s Eighth Doctor was very much the Big Finish version and, watching him was like having a Big Finish audio come to life. His tone and performance was very much a Big Finish Eighth Doctor performance.
Which makes sense as that’s the character he’d developed of the Doctor since 2001.

Splendid Chaps - “Who and Books”


4th March 2013

The Northcote Library kept us eager Doctor Who fans, fans of the Splendid Chaps podcast waiting in the 15 degree cold weather outside the library, right up until 4:30 and a bit pm. Why? No idea. They’re probably just into acting like the Master in Castrovalava and we’re all their Adric.

Petra, following up her appearances as/within a Dalek during the MICF walked into the start of this podcast in a spacesuit with the audio of Proper Dave saying “Hey, who turned out the lights?” appropriately from the Doctor Who TV story “Silence in the Library”.

The guests for the podcast were Katie Purvis and Dave Hoskin. Hoskin has written two Doctor Who-universe stories one “iNtRUsioNs” in the Doctor Who short story anthology; Short Trips: Transmissions edited by Richard Salter and one “Writing in Green” in the Bernice Summerfield short story anthology Something Changed edited by Simon Guerrier both are published by Big Finish Productions. Although only ‘Something Changed’ is still in print.
Damaged Goods
There were several reading moody readings; from novelisations, short stories (Hoskin’s “iNtRUsioNs”) Virgin New Adventure novels (“Damaged Goods” by Russell T. Davies) and Doctor Who Quiz Books. The podcast closed with a dramatic reading by Lawrence Leung of the the Make Your Own Adventure novel “Crisis in Space” by Michael Holt.

There was much discussion and praise for Terrance Dicks “Uncle Terry” and his novelisations and his many stock phrases that he used to describe the Doctor and how the TARDIS sounds (a wheeze groaning sound).
Personally I’m more a fan of the comics which describe the TARDIS as going ‘Vworp-Vworp’. That at least seems like an attempt to render what the TARDIS’s materialisation sound is in prose.

Aside from being mentioned by Petra in her introduction the BBC Eighth Doctor Adventures and Past Doctor Adventures weren’t mentioned during the podcast. Something of a disappointment as I’m something of a fan of those.

The Virgin New Adventures were mentioned, but weren’t really discussed as much as I’d hoped. These were novels that the publisher (Virgin Books) described as “too broad and deep for the small screen”, these were novels that were written for a then adult (though young, but not “young adult”) audience. These novels included sex, violence and ‘mature language’.
These stories were gone into a little bit, but some of the context for them was missing a little bit.
It was still funny going through the various ways Kate Orman (the only female writer who wrote for the Virgin New Adventures) tortures the Seventh Doctor in each of the stories he appears in written by her. Including the fairly graphic time when in The Room With No Doors he holding a baby, and is then shot with an arrow, with the arrow going through the baby’s head and embedding in between his ribs, putting him in a coma, but his companion thinks him dead so buries him. When he awakens he has to dig out of his own grave.
Not all New Adventures were that graphic, there’s Transit, which has the word “Fuck” in it; 10 times, it was the first novel to use that word.
This wasn’t mentioned during the podcast recording.

They did however mention the planet Dildo, one of many spelling mistakes and factual errors in “The Doctors - 30 Years of Time Travel” by Adrian Rigelsford.

There was some interesting and funny analysis of some of the novels and how they pre-empted the post-2005 TV series. Dave Hoskin’s comments on “Damaged Goods” that it basically has all the elements of RTD’s Doctor Who isn’t new (I’ve read similar things before) but just how he commented on it made me think anew about it.
Doctor Who and the Quiz Book of Dinosaurs
The Doctor Who Quiz Book of Dinosaurs reading was hilarious, as Hoskin commented it sounded like Tegan was on LSD. It clearly sounds like Michael Holt who wrote it had been given a (very) brief description of the Fifth Doctor, Tegan and Nyssa, then just wrote this quiz book from there. As all the Doctor, Tegan and Nyssa are so very out of character, the internal area of the TARDIS and its control room don’t resemble the TV series and Tegan is very out of character.

It was nice to see at the recording so many people who’re fans of the books, as while I’ve always been a fan of Doctor Who for a long time, like Ben McKenzie (one of the hosts of Splendid Chaps) the New Adventures and Eighth Doctor Adventures are what made me a bigger fan. These are the stories that continued to tell the Doctor Who story after the series finished in 1989 with Survival and then was given a zap with the paddles in 1996 with the TV Movie staring Paul McGann. It was said during the podcast if you read the New Adventures and the Eighth Doctor Adventures there is less of a gap, story development wise between Survival, the TV movie and Rose.
The novels developed so many different ideas and their slightly edgier existence meant that they could explore more mature themes that once stood outside of the TV show, while other concepts like paradoxes, bi-sexual companions and the destruction of Gallifrey was done in the novels as it was thought that was something that would never happen in the TV show.

Again, like previous shows this one seemed too short, despite going for 1 hour 30 minutes or so. There was so much more that could have been covered, the annuals were very briefly skipped over, Bernice Summerfield’s development from companion to main character wasn’t mentioned or how she and Fitz Kreiner are the longest appearing prose-based characters in Doctor Who’s history. I know with so much stuff that’s been published it’s difficult to focus on everything and still keep it relevant to those who’re not as widely read as others. Although, from looking at Ben McKenzie’s twitter feed, he seemed to have read and brought along a lot more books than were actually mentioned in the podcast. Having been to all the previous podcast recordings (except the one in Adelaide) they do seem to prepare a lot of things to talk about and then just run out of time because the guests are very interesting on their own and have interesting things to say. Which is pretty much similar to many other podcasts I listen to.

I am still looking forward to the the next recording Five/Fear and intend to attend all the other podcasts this year (that take place in Victoria). They (John Richards and Ben McKenzie) have said that Splendid Chaps is a series of 11 podcasts that they’re doing this year and this was episode 7, however last episode, episode 6 was actually two shows joined together. They also mentioned a Doctor Who and Food themed episode as well, which might also fall outside of the 11 previously mentioned. They also mentioned it possibly being 26 episodes rather than 11.
We shall, it seems have to wait and see, how many episodes there will actually be of this podcast, whose projected episodes seems to grow each time I see it.