Salted Caramel



Caramel is basically cooked sugar.
It’s created by either heating sugar on its own up to melting point and then a little bit beyond that.
Or by mixing it with water, bringing it up to melting point and evaporating off the water.

There’s also caramel, the slightly gooey substance which is more chocolate-like in its sensation and pairings. It’s the stuff inside a Caramello Koala.
That (well probably not that inside the Koala), but that sort of stuff has butter or cream added to the caramel.

Salt is mostly sodium chloride, with a few other minor bits and pieces.

Salt is basically a flavour enhancer, it also preserves organic material quite well.
Salt’s method of enhancing flavour is a little bit complicated, but from what I understand it suppresses bitterness.[1] But also increase sweet, sour and umami flavours.[2]

Some other sites and people around the internets will suggest the salt cuts through the sweet flavours and allows the other flavours; sour and umami to shine through.

Now that I’ve given a quick run through of caramel and salt, moving on to Coles.

Coles has for sale two salted caramel products, the first I noticed because I nearly bought it, but didn’t the second I noticed because it was for sale.

“Salted Caramel Filled Donuts 6PK”.
These were in Coles when I wandered through the baked goods isle.
I almost bought them because I thought they were Coles’ jam filled variety of jam doughnut, something which I probably shouldn’t buy or eat, but do on occasion. They’re not the best jam doughnut, I could probably get a better one from the local bakery or something like that, I could definitely get a better one by going to a Sunday market sort of affair. But occasionally when in the supermarket they’re not bad. If you buy them on the day they’re cooked, sometimes Coles lets them sit in the packet for 3+ days.

These weren’t jam filled doughnuts though.
These were “Salted Caramel Filled Donuts”.
I’m under no delusion that the jam filling has much resemblance to fruit (although it does have some, mostly apple and a bit of red fruit usually strawberry or maybe raspberry).
But “Salted Caramel Filled Donuts” is just...
A doughnut is a ball of basically bread, covered in sugar, then filled with jam.
But these “Salted Caramel Filled Donuts”, that’s over doing it, over icing the doughnut with that amount of stuff.

The other item that caught my eye was “Salted Caramel Peanuts 400grams”. Sweet peanuts in general I just don’t get, the same with sweet popcorn.

The other item, which I only found by looking on Coles online is salted caramel ice cream.

I just...I guess people are buying it if they’re offering it.
But it seems just a little too over indulgent.

Caramel is essentially cooked sugar, paired with salt.
If it’s a caramel sauce type thing it’s cooked sugar, butter or cream and then added salt.

I know no one’s claiming these things are health foods. But there is something, to me that seems like this is too much.
Like this is a bad combination of things, made easily available as a filling for a doughnut.
Having a doughnut isn’t exactly the healthiest choice, but it’s usually just a hit of dough and sugar (and if you’re really lucky something that began life as a fruit).
But with Coles’ “Salted Caramel Filled Donuts” you get that double whack of salt as well.

The Splendid Chaps Christmas Special

On Sunday 15th December 2013 was the final Splendid Chaps podcast;

The Splendid Chaps Christmas Special. I didn’t want them to go, but I'll keep warm, there may be a tear, it'll hurt, but the moment has been prepared for.

It all began with a girl in a red dress. Except she wasn't inside a Dalek, she was singing next to one. And her dress was more Christmas party than junior entertainment manager. There was a 1960s Dalek movie Dalek on stage and Petra Elliot singing the "ill-conceived" hit from 1964 by The Go-Go’s; "I'm Gonna Spend My Christmas With A Dalek". I happen to know the words to this song quite well, as I listened to it many times to write the lyrics our for the Tardis Wiki, it's for the same reason I also know the lyrics to “Who is the Doctor?" a spoken word song by Jon Pertwee.

Following on from the song John and Ben came out on stage. John in a fetching Barbara-wear inspired cardigan and Ben in a Tenth Doctor-influenced dressing gown.

Each of the guests brought a 'gift' of a Doctor/main character to the podcast, with information and observations.

The people / shows that were covered were; Peter Cushing and the 1960s Dalek movies, Trevor Martin and the Seven Keys to Doomsday, The Curse of Fatal Death, Big Finish's Doctor Who Unbound series, Scream of the Shalka, K9 & Company and The Sarah Jane Adventures, plus Torchwood.

Alexandra Tynan who designed the Cybermen also made a return appearance, and mentioned of 'An Adventure in Space and Time' that the scene at the start with her Cyberman design and the bloke smoking in the suit didn't happen and wouldn't've happened back then, but the theme and style was spot on. And also the look of all the people in it they got spot on. She also said in the regeneration scene, where Patrick Troughton is standing there with William Hartnell, she was there, but in '

Scream of the Shalka

loading screen

An Adventure in Space and Time' there were "two blokes there!". Of Scream of the Shalka it was mentioned by Fee Plumley that technology and where the BBC saw it going played a part in it. Both in its production and being at the forefront of media on the net at a time before YouTube and everything, at the moment the site needs Flash 4.0 to run the webcast which is still up on the site.

But in 2003 when it was released most people were still on dial-up. Though like Ben McKenzie, I was excited to be able to watch Doctor Who at the same time as everyone else, something that wouldn't really happen again until The Day of the Doctor. Yes there are broadcasts practically after the UK ones, but that's only been happening in the past year or three. It was, I seem to recall painfully slow on dial-up. I remember letting it load and just waiting, a bar very slowly moving along the screen as it loaded up on my 56k modem. But it was amazing to be able to see that story.

You can still relive the experience of watching it now, follow this link and click play all on any of the episodes. You’ll get a box that says “You will need Flash to see the animations. Get help here”, don’t do that, instead click Full Screen, and after a particularly long loading screen it will play. Or follow this link to episode one. It also had interesting bits of technology, as was pointed out in the live show by Fee Plumley. The mobile phone in the TARDIS, replacing the phone inside the panel of the exterior police box shell, and the Doctor being able to use it to escape falling into a blackhole by "reminding it that it's part of the TARDIS". In the webcast it unfolds in spectacular fashion and he escapes.

Adam Richards who presented the K9 & Company and The Sarah Jane Adventures

portion made an interesting observation, or relayed the observation that when The Sarah Jane Adventures was on TV, it allowed Doctor Who to be a bit more dramatic and gritty. Because The Sarah Jane Adventures could have farting aliens and useless Sontarans and, basically do the light hearted and occasionally comical stories that Doctor Who couldn't or didn't want to do. It did get me thinking though, why don't we have alternate series anymore for Doctor Who. It has if anything gotten darker and more complex, but has held its audience.

But back in the 2007-11 we had 3 Doctor Who-based series going at once; Doctor Who, Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures. Elisabeth Sladen passed away and Torchwood reached a few crescendos. With series 3 of Torchwood it reached epic levels of grittiness. With as Djoymi Baker saying they're left with 2 very bad choices, give 10% of children to the aliens to use as drugs or say goodbye to the human race. The American Torchwood still had that grittiness but as Djoymi Baker pointed out, taking it away from Wales and bringing it to sunny beaches and whatever just doesn't work. The grittiness, the cold, grim Welsh landscape is what made Torchwood different and unique.The BBC could easily generate another spin-off series using what people have been introduced thus far, to create other marketable programmes. There's the Eighth Doctor series that everyone's now clamouring to have, now that they've seen him in The Night of the Doctor and seen what great acting chops Paul McGann has. He's been doing great work in Big Finish audios. Actually that reminds me when Myke Bartlett was talking about the Big Finish Doctor Who Unbounds he mentioned something I'd not thought about before.

When Big Finish got Paul McGann in originally to do the audios, they defaulted to the 25 minute and episode format, something his Doctor never did as he debuted in the 85 minute TV movie and he debuted with a fairly "classical" companion an character with an RP sort of accent (Charley Pollard), an Edwardian companion for Paul McGann's Byronic Eighth Doctor.

It was only much later that they went for single episode stories that fit onto 1 CD.

Back to The Night of the Doctor, those 7 minutes really showed to everyone the potential for an Eighth Doctor series, but I'm not sure if the BBC would green light a series like that considering they're launching a new Doctor with Capaldi's 12 or 13th Doctor depending on who you ask (Moffat lies). Having two properties like that on the same time for similar audiences is something they'd probably want to avoid. There's the potential for a "science leads" UNIT, with Jemma Redgrave's Kate Lethbridge-Stewart. UNIT could be the new Torchwood, and as Torchwood's been destroyed (or maybe living on in America), it'd be the perfect sort of thing to create. There's always the alien hunter route with Mickey and Martha. Except both actors are off doing other things.

Maybe they could just do a spin off series with the Curator introducing tales from the Under-Gallery and then stories leading off from that. I’m sure Tom Baker would love to do some acting straight to camera. Returning back to the Splendid Chaps Christmas Special live podcast recording. There were songs. Several. There was the aforementioned “I’m Gonna Spend My Christmas With A Dalek” at the start of the show, then Ben McKenzie sang a very solemn version of “Song for Ten” from The Christmas Invasion just before the interval.

Then at the start of the second segment after the interval was the whole song with its many verses from Ghost Light “That’s The Way To The Zoo”. Then finally from The Gunfighters “The Ballad of the Last Chance Saloon (Splendid Chaps Edit)", all five verses, with a lyric sheet provided to the audience (although many had to share, but I was on the end of the isle with no one next to me so I have one, which I shall cherish, or more likely lose). According to John Richards he got the sheet music and lyrics for “That’s The Way To the Zoo” from Mark Ayers and there were many more verses than appeared in Ghost Light. All up it was a great end to the podcast series. I was there for the first episode, and well due to life getting in the way had missed a few here and there. I am sad that it’s finished, and wish there was more, it was great to actually be able to go to a live podcast recording, monthly about Doctor Who. Although it won’t be the end, it can’t be, this is Doctor Who. They’ve already announced a spin-off web series.

Plus, it can always come back, maybe for a special show in November next year...or something. Doctor Who doesn’t die, it just changes formats, is kept alive in different formats, it endures the wilderness, it lives on, being reinterpreted and rewritten. So I hope the podcast will return in the same incarnation but a new outfit and new venue. Or maybe return in a new, different incarnation, with vague descriptions of where it’s been, it’ll have odd ears and a modern jacket, but one day... One day it will come back, until there must be no tears, no carrot juice, just go forward and make the spin-off of your desires.

Thank you. It’s good. Keep warm.

Retail experiences late-2013

I was going to post a couple of individuals posts concerning a few retail experiences I’ve had of late but thought I’d wrap them all into one post as none of them really met the threshold I have for being long enough to post.

Like others at this time of year I’ve been shopping for gifts and in general just out and about shopping and had a few mostly negative experiences. The positive ones have just been things by the way side, those no one needs to hear about, as a positive experience, unless it’s something really exceptional isn’t notable. A positive experience is just a...a non-event.
A negative one makes you change your decisions.


Retail experience #1 - Shaver Shop

I went into the Shaver Shop earlier this week with the intention of buying a product for which this shop is named.

I’d done my research online, actually, I hadn’t as reviews for shavers come down to a personal choice and a decision in general between Braun and Philips for the most part. Then there’s the unhelpful forums where people say ‘this doesn’t answer your question, but why don’t you just use a razor?’, that’s not helpful mate.

I had a question and an intention.

One of the guys who works in the shop wandered over within at least 5 seconds of me walking into the shop, so no time for me to browse, though I didn’t really need to.
Then he opened his mouth.
Bah.
Smoker’s breath.
Intense smoker’s breath like wading through second hand smoke when he was speaking to me.

I don’t begrudge someone deciding to have a cigarette. I don’t actually care what they do, as long as I don’t have to walk through second hand smoke to get anywhere, what people choose to poison their bodies with is not my concern.

However, if you’re in the retail industry, chew a mind or something. Especially if you’re wanting to project a keen and helpful air and approaching customers quickly when they enter your shop. Chew a mint, use some breath freshener, do something.

I did try to power through. I asked my question (concerning the “cleaning station” that some shavers have and if it’s worth it), he did answer my question honestly, without trying to push me towards it (as those with the “cleaning station” are the most expensive).

I considered remaining, to continue to power through and purchase the product I was there to buy, but it just wasn’t worth the unpleasantness caused from the smell of smoke emanating from him.

I will likely take my business elsewhere, maybe to the quite useless and almost incompetent Myer who never seem to have staff to help you. Perhaps The Good Guys stocks what I want, or maybe it will mean a return the the den of low false ceilings and fluorescent lighting that is Harvey Norman, I will just have to make sure I check the price online first and be prepared for them not to try and charge me a different price from that.



Retail experience #2 - Culture Kings Melbourne

Just slightly too loud.

I went into Culture Kings in Melbourne during this past week.

I could possibly be outside their target market, I went in there to indulge my interest in shoes, amongst other things. I also find the clothing range they, and similar shops have to be comfortable and practical.
Mostly because the ‘street-style’ genre of clothing has lots of pockets, is easy and comfortable to wear and more or less practical for my day to day life.

The music inside was just slightly too loud.

I did consider asking to try a pair of shoes on, or rather ask them to find my size. But didn’t, mostly because the music was just slightly too loud making it just slightly unpleasant to be in there.

I’m not being grumpy or “old”, well not deliberately. But the music was of a loudness that, were you to attempt to talk it was above that of a raised voice and edging towards shouting.
I can deal with loud music, hell, I’ve stood next to speaker stacks when at some gigs. But, in a retail environment, I think there needs to be a balance between creating an ambiance for the space and it being over powering.

From visiting Culture Kings today it made me not to want to go in there again and instead visit places like; Fast Times Skateboarding, Blindside Skateboarding and other more shoe-based shops like Platypus and Hype DC, and even to an alternate extent General Pants Co and places like that.


Retail experience #3 - Il Papiro

I’d often walked past Il Papiro in the past, and this year I wanted to buy a notebook / journal as a late gift of a birthday present for myself.

I asked 2 questions of the lady in the shop, neither I thought were particularly odd questions and neither I thought odd nor worthy of getting shitty with me for.

I went into Il Papiro to get a refillable notebook, because I write and scribble notes quite a bit, and if I am to spent $100 or so on a leather bound notebook then I would want to be able to take the guts of it out and put more paper into it.

The first question was ‘which of these notebooks are lined?’, as in which of these have lined paper? That’s not an unreasonable question, I thought and that was answered simply and finely.
I had a look and couldn’t quite find the one I wanted, but was willing to make a compromise on one or two, they were seem to recall  $76 and $96.

Then I asked what was the fateful question which made the lady get quite curt and uppity with me. I asked, what I thought was a reasonable question ‘are these notebooks refillable?’.
No. Was the answer. ‘we’re a bookbinding and paper business, we don’t do refillable notebooks. It’s because there’s the finery of bookbinding with the materials...’. I’ve added the ellipsis in there as I don’t recall any further of her answer to the question, the tone was quite clear.

Okay, fine.
I understand that, the tone and curt nature of the answer not so much.
I didn’t buy my notebook in there.

Now, looking at Il Papiro’s website the front page states:

In the heart of Melbourne's laneways, you will discover a little paper shop. Reminicent (sic) of a time gone by, its shelves are full of leather journals, marbled photo albums, watermarked writing papers, wax seals, inks and quills - all handcrafted in our Florentine work shops, according to traditional techniques.

If your business is paper, then it is not out of the question that you might sell paper for a journal. Also journals that can take some of your paper, over and over again.

After some searching online I did find for myself a notebook that did suit my needs and idea of a notebook that I was looking for. A French-made refillable notebook from a company called La Compagnie du Kraft. Everything including the paper is French made. I didn’t buy the notebook from the company’s website as the postage was something of a killer with the notebook costing €45 from La Compagnie du Kraft’s site and then there was another €50+ on top for postage to Australia which brought the approximate total to around $137 AUD (there were 3 different postage prices; 2 by Fedex and 1 by UPS). Instead I bought it from Kaufmann Mercantile, a US-based website, which had the journal for $70.40 AUD (which is $1.88 AUD more than the French site), whilst the postage was $32.20 AUD. Bringing the total to $102.60 AUD. Their site incidentally went to AUD and announced that it would ship to Australia, La Compagnie du Kraft’s site was a little more oblique about shipping and while their site is available in both English and French their address entry form is only in French, requiring a little visit to Google Translate as my high school French has mostly deserted me.


On a final note, I did look on Australia-based websites for a leather refillable notebook, but did not find one that completely suited what I was looking for. I found one or two that was sort of what I was looking for on NoteMaker.com.au but none that I found on there were exactly what I was looking for. I also, once I had found La Compagnie du Kraft’s notebook did attempt to find it available on an Australian site, the store finder on La Compagnie du Kraft’s site did list an Australian website someplace. However they only stocked a notebook with a paper cover rather than the leather one I was looking for.

Melbourne Social Writers' Group - Dialogue Challenge

As mentioned in a previous post there's a social writers' group that I attend, this is the outcome of one of the writing challenges/games.

Parameters: Story had to start with the piece of dialogue “You did what?”, be made up of primarily dialogue and for extra challenge not use the word “said”.

In jotting down ideas to start writing this I wrote out a few key words / ideas to give myself something to start with these were; cake, politics, cane sugar, oven, import/export and genocide.

As I wrote I decided to try and make genocide funny. Not in a way that devalues it as a concept, but to try and bring humour to it without going down an expected path with the subject.

I think, taking a second look at it, it almost works. There’s a few bits here and there that don’t work and didn’t go in the way I was intending and as one of the people who attended you can see where I was going with it. It’s a little too much not subtle, but for 15 minutes work I don’t think it’s too bad.


--//

"You did what?"
"I don't think it's a big deal, it's not something amazingly complicated." She complained of the situation.
"You don't think this is a big deal, we're surrounded by cake and the UN is making the suggestion of rights violations." He exclaimed to the woman who was looking around the space with a mixture of annoyance and impatience.
"Who we should really be blaming is the cane sugar lobby, they're why we're here in the first place. We shouldn't be worried about a little bit of genocide." She mused.
Lyle watched the woman opposite him to see if she was joking. "There's nothing little about a bit of genocide!" She exclaimed.
Sarah shrugged. "It's not as though it's a big deal, this is something we've been working on for a while. The genocide is just an unintended consequence of these matters."
Lyle hoped she hadn't told the press that, he asked her as much.
"Of course not. YOU haven't prepared a press release, that's what you're always talking about, needing to keep the press informed." Sarah paused and smiled, flicking out a finger to one of the iced cakes beside her. "But if we do, we have plenty of cake to keep them satisfied."
"Yes, let's not talk about the messy subject of genocide." Lyle commented sarcastically.
"I thought we might lead with that, it's a boon for the economy that we've managed to do this when everyone else has failed." She argued. "I don't know why you're up set about this Lyle, I've done something, that's better than most of the politicians you've managed in the past."
"Yes." He paused. "Lead with that, not the genocide." He felt like he needed a drink. But the closest that was around in this space was some sugar cane left by the growers' federation.
"So, now I'm writing my press release, instead of you; my press officer, Lyle, what is the matter? It's like you've never wanted to commit genocide before. Think of all the possibilities if we managed to do this with other problems." She said looking around frowning. "This is the problem, they take all the chairs with them when they leave."
"You think that's the biggest problem, we're casually standing around surrounded by cakes talking about genocide."
"The great sugar cane grower’s federation bake off was the crowning achievement of the mass destruction that we achieved. "
"'Mass destruction', that's what you're calling it?" Lyle was almost hysterical.
"You sound distressed."
"I'm just trying to work out how to sell this to the press. Is there any alcohol in this kitchen?" He wondered, pausing to look around. "Hang on you said 'mass destruction'."
Sarah raised an eyebrow at him. "Yes."
"What about this genocide?"
"I thought genocide sounded better, punchier than 'mass destruction', that's rather clinical."
"But.” Lyle felt himself relax as the hysteria passed into annoyance. "Mass destruction is the code phrase for our cane toad eradication service." The rage was now building in his mind. "And you wanted to call it a genocide?!"

Donating

I donate infrequently to things I care about.
I think you need to care about something in order to donate to it, not to be guilted, forced or otherwise coerced into donating.

The people who try to get you to donate to causes in the shopping centres and what not...I just don’t care enough about them. It might be apathetic of me and possibly a little heartless when I actually tell them that when they’ve badgered me when I’ve been walking past, but...I dunno.

When I was in high school, the year levels were bunched into groups of about 20 people to work out charity things that could decide on things to donate to.
The group that I was in decided that a World Vision child would be the thing to donate money to.
I raised the question of wouldn’t it be better / closer to home to donate to indigenous causes, something which I thought was of more concern. The idea wasn’t exactly shut down but the World Vision thing was pushed forward as the better thing to do. At the time I wasn’t in retrospect as vocal as I could have been.
I also and continue to be a bit apathetic to certain causes and things like that.

There are a few things I do donate to;

Recently I have donated to the Alfred Hospital Haematology and Oncology Centre, it’s something close to my heart and a place that provided great care, it’s something I’ll likely continue to donate to for a long time.

The Country Fire Authority (CFA) is something I think all Victorians would donate to, be it chucking some coins into their pot at traffic lights or other donations. (There are similar volunteer fire organisations in other states of Australia). I really think that the CFA members should get more from the government for their contributions to the safety of our country. Even something like free car registrations or something. Considering what they do it seems...disrespectful that we don’t do more for the volunteers.

Finally the other organisation I donate to is the Wikimedia Foundation, which in their own words is “The Wikimedia Foundation is the non-profit organization that operates Wikipedia and other free knowledge projects.”.
Wikipedia is something I use probably every day and probably more than once every day. I occasionally edit on Wikipedia as well as just read the articles.
I wholly believe that access to knowledge helps people and Wikipedia is one of the best places to start off your journey into discovering knowledge.
I know people mock Wikipedia’s accuracy, but those inaccuracies can be fixed and will be fixed, especially if someone notes it on the article / article’s talk page. A published reference book will also have inaccuracies and arguably Wikipedia can change faster than any published book be it paper or e-book.
Wikipedia also covers a far, far greater ranger of topics than any publishing house could.

I don’t think Wikipedia should be the only place you go for information, and I think people who suggest it should be are missing the point. All articles on Wikipedia are sourced (or should be), Wikipedia is the start of the journey of discovering things, not the end. With a regular paper encyclopaedia you don’t just read that and stop, you’d seek out other sources. Just so with Wikipedia, you begin there and branch out to look at other sources of information.

Cinema rants

When I was younger I would, occasionally buy some popcorn when seeing a movie. But usually I’d eat the popcorn during the trailers, during the stuff that doesn’t matter, where you can watch or eat or whatever.

The Day of the Doctor was 75 minutes long. Most movies are at least 100 plus minutes long.

Recently (fine, in the last 5+ years) if I’ve wanted to see a movie in the cinemas I’ve been waiting until it’s on its last few weeks of release, so I could go to the cinema and have space around me, so I’m not next to people chewing like a cow munches grass in the field or rustling around in a bucket of chaff and grains getting the last few bits out of the bucket.

The woman next to me in the cinema was younger than me (I found out through engaging in friendly conversation), though over 18 and also...I don’t know how to say this without sounding critical, but significantly larger than me and only just within the dimensions of the cinema seat.
I, at first engaged her in conversation and didn’t really pay attention to her bucket of popcorn, 2 bags of Maltesers and another packet of something that I couldn’t see or immediately identify. And a Vitamin Water.
Then, whilst chatting to me she started to eat, and then asked me a question (about Doctor Who) with a mouthful of Maltesers.
That’s when I wanted to quit on reality. Instead I did the next best thing and pulled out my phone and retreated to twitter.

People vomiting in front of me and people talking to me with a mouth full of something. Two things I cannot deal with.
Actually even the latter, if they’re at least a table’s width away from me I think I could deal with it. She was less than 20 centimetres away from me.

A bucket of popcorn, I’m not being deliberately facetious, it was a bucket size of popcorn. There were other sizes, I saw other people carrying other sizes of popcorn.
Two bags of Maltesers and something else unidentified.

I admit, I was glad that when I booked my ticket I decided to err on the side of caution and get an isle seat. This was in part because I thought it’d be busy but also because I have long legs and like to stretch out down the isle.

If I had been trapped next to the bucket of popcorn I think I may have screamed.
The talking to me with a mouthful of Maltesers almost sent me over the edge.

I would, I think have preferred to sit next to a child waving a sonic screwdriver about, they would have had more decorum.

75 minutes is not long enough to need a bucket of popcorn, 2 bags of Maltesers, an unidentified bag of something else and a Vitamin Water.

If it’s a normal length of movie, 100 plus minutes then maybe, understand going with one of those things.

But if you were watching The Day of the Doctor or indeed any 75 minute show at home, would you need or want that much stuff?

Favourite Doctors

As we barrel towards the 23rd November with the 50th anniversary of Doctor Who, the question of ‘who’s your favourite Doctor’ will always come up when talking with people. Those who are fans or even those who have mild interest. Everyone will have a favourite.

My answer to the question is a little more in depth than others, probably, because I’ve been a fan for a while, during the 90s when it wasn’t so friendly to be a fan of a show that wasn’t even on any more.

‘My Doctor’, the one who I watched on TV was Sylvester McCoy, the Seventh Doctor. He was all mysterious, teasing Davros about rice pudding and facing evil from the dawn of time. All the while making Ace face her fears and playing spoons.

My favourite Doctor for his on screen portrayal is however Jon Pertwee, the Third Doctor. He’s just got a something, it’s said in various press that Tom Baker believed he was the Doctor and would often do stuff interviews in-character. But Jon Pertwee, as scientific advisor to UNIT and beyond after that had something of the scientist to him. He was a bit eccentric, he’s got the Venusian aikido moves and he had lots of gadgets. He too also acted like the Doctor at interviews and other things.

The Virgin New Adventures, a book series that continued on from the TV series after it finished in 1989 made me a fan of the Seventh Doctor. In prose form his character became more detailed, more interesting. But I would say I am more a fan of that era, rather than that Doctor. It’s not, in this case about the Doctor but the era he’s a part of, and those books published from 1991 to 1997 are some of my favourite stories and the series as a whole was brilliant and made me think of Doctor Who in a different way. They were also the only new long form prose stories being published during the ‘Wilderness Years’ - the time when there wasn’t any Doctor Who being produced for TV.

On audio meanwhile, the stories produced by Big Finish Productions beginning in 1999, my favourite Doctor from their stories is Colin Baker’s Sixth Doctor or ‘old Sixie’ as he refers to his Doctor as.
The Sixth Doctor didn’t get a great run on TV, a fairly grumpy occasionally violent Doctor, he was given a new and fresh perspective in Big Finish’s audio stories. Big Finish and Colin Baker have made me love the Sixth Doctor. It is the Sixth Doctor stories I enjoy the most listening to from Big Finish.

The Eighth Doctor deserves special mention for being my favourite Doctor over multiple mediums, in audio, prose and comic he is a favourite of mine. In the BBC Books, which like the Virgin New Adventures continued the Eighth Doctor’s story after the TV movie in 1996. The audios produced by Big Finish began in 2001 and the comics published by Doctor Who Magazine began shortly after the TV movie.
Considering the writers only had one story to draw inspiration from there is a remarkably strong character of the Doctor in these different mediums. His character gets developed and changed, but there’s still something uniquely Eighth Doctor-y about him, and things that referenced back to the TVM.
In the recent The Night of the Doctor Paul McGann’s Eighth Doctor was very much the Big Finish version and, watching him was like having a Big Finish audio come to life. His tone and performance was very much a Big Finish Eighth Doctor performance.
Which makes sense as that’s the character he’d developed of the Doctor since 2001.

Australia spied on Luxembourg and Iceland Prime Ministers

No.
Not really.

That would be surprising.
That Australia spied on the Indonesian President isn’t remotely surprising. It’s odd that people are reacting as though it is.

Australia has intelligence agencies. We have the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) and the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD, though they were formally known as the Defence Signal Directorate (DSD)).
Intelligence agencies collect intelligence or “spy”.

The Australian Signals Directorate even has a catch phrase under their title "Reveal Their Secrets - Protect Our Own”. Which is a fairly interesting catch phrase. ASIS doesn’t it just says “Australia’s overseas secret intelligence collection agency”.

The basic difference between them is the ASD is a Defence organisation and ASIS isn’t. Which would likely explain the slightly more aggressive "Reveal Their Secrets - Protect Our Own" summary of what they do.

Looking at the overviews of what they do provided on ASIS and ASD’s websites they explain what they do, in no really clear terms.

ASIS site says:
“ASIS's primary goal is to obtain and distribute secret intelligence about the capabilities, intentions and activities of individuals or organisations outside Australia, which may impact on Australia's interests and the well-being of its citizens.”

While ASD’s site throws a few more terms in there:
“The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) is an intelligence agency in the Australian Government Department of Defence, with its headquarters in Canberra.

Our mission, ‘Reveal their secrets, protect our own’, accurately summarises our role. ASD:

  • collects and analyses foreign signals intelligence, known as Sigint
  • provides advice and assistance on information and communications security, known as InfoSec.”

What they do should come as no surprise.
They’re intelligence agencies, they spy, they gather information.
They protect Australia’s interests.
That Australia has spied on Indonesia should be no surprise. If it’s revealed that we’ve spied on other countries in the Asia Pacific it shouldn’t be a surprise either.

However if it comes out that ASIS or ASD have been spying on Jean-Claude Juncker (Prime Minister of Luxembourg) or Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson (Prime Minister of Iceland) then I will be surprised.

Also, a little bit intrigued.

Tea Capsules

I have never been disgusted and angered by a product until I saw this product being advertised the other night. I saw it during the ad-break of “Escape to the Country”, and it disgusted me that this product existed.

“now also available in convenient tea capsules!” so says Dilmah’s website of their Tea Capsules.

I know, they’re attempting to cash in on the coffee capsule craze.

But coffee and its myriad of flavours and whatever I can sort of see a purpose, as much as any other coffee device. There’s plenty of coffee making devices, the stove top brewing the moka pot, or plunger or even coffee bags. Plus the poor cousin; instant coffee.
I don’t really know where one method of coffee sits against the other, I’m not a coffee drinker.

But tea.
Tea is different, essentially you can have loose leaf tea in a tea pot or some sort of single cup device that replicates a tea pot on a smaller scale. Or you have tea bags. Simple.
Everyone who drinks tea will make it by using either or both of these methods; loose leaf or tea bags.

Why, why, why would “tea capsules” be good?
Or more to the point why would they be better than tea bags or loose lead tea?

I presume (again as I don’t own a ‘capsule coffee make’) that you would need to pass some water through the nozzle of the coffee machine to clean it prior to making you tea other wise you might end up with a little bit a coffee in your tea. Dilmah’s website does indicate you should do this.

Also, what of cost?
High to extreme I would think.

I don’t drink Dilmah’s tea as I have always drunken Australian grown tea, which is Nerada tea. So I’ll be comparing the prices between that and Dilmah’s tea capsules.

According to the Dilmah’s website a packet of their English Breakfast has 10 servings in it and costs $5.20 AUD, according to Woolworths’ website it costs $5.90 AUD.
Compared to Nerada’s 100 pack of tea bags on Coles’ website is $4.61 AUD, I’ve listed Coles’ website rather than Woolworths as theirs is currently on special (it’s on special for $2.99 but is usually $4.57 AUD, essentially no difference in price between the big two).
So in order to equal the servings of the 100 Nerada tea bags with the Dilmah capsules you’d need to spend $52.

What of the environmental costs?
As I mentioned above, I drink Nerada Tea, which is grown in Australia, an Australian company, employing Australians. The tea only travels as far afield as Australia, from where it’s grown in the fields to the factory where it’s dried and packed.

Dilmah’s and every other tea company has to at least be shipped into the country.
But these tea capsules, they’re made out of plastic and aluminium (according to the Wikipedia page).
I very much doubt that the bits of aluminium in these tea capsules are conventionally recyclable by the council.

On tea bag front, tea bags are made out of paper, they’ll rot in any compost or in any landfill.

Finally.
Control.
I like my tea a certain way, I use tea bags because that gives me the best balance between control and simplicity. Occasionally I’ll use loose leaf tea in a tea pot (and not use Nerada’s tea, in that case I’ll use T2’s Daintree tea as Nerada’s loose leaf is sometimes blended with imported teas.
I like my tea strong, I usually use 2 tea bags and let it steep for a while.
With these capsules, high pressure hot water (from what I understand) is forced through the capsule.
So you can’t control *how* your tea is brewed, it just gets spurted out into your cup.

Tea making was already a simple process, with infinite control and minimal amounts of waste.
These tea capsules make the process complicated, produce a lot more waste and take away all control.
If I didn’t already not drink Dilmah I’d boycott it.

Buy Nerada Tea Bags or T2 Daintree Loose Leaf Tea. Both are good, Nerada’s is inexpensive, T2’s isn’t as cheap, but is still cheaper than tea capsules.

iTunes Podcast Tab Freeze

I manage some of my podcasts manually. Most are managed by just selecting “Automatically include all unplayed episodes of selected podcasts” under the Podcasts tab of iTunes.

As of iTunes 11 just selecting the podcasts tab when I’ve got an iPhone (iPhone 4S) or an iPod Classic (iPod Classic 160GB) plugged in has resulted in iTunes beachballing.
At first if I just left it it’d beachball for around 10-15 minutes and then it would eventually get to the Podcasts tab.

However this waiting period has seemed to just get longer or not work entirely. It’s also tiresome having to do this when it used to be a seamless simple process.

After searching through various forums I found one possible explanation and sort of solution. Supposedly iTunes is accessing the internet, for some reason in order to go to the Podcasts tab. The solution that was touted on the forums was to turn off Wi-Fi or unplug the Ethernet cable from the computer.
Turning off Wi-Fi is simple enough, but I’ve got an Ethernet cable plugged in.

I did test this, and amazing it worked, I was able to simply click on the Podcasts tab and it worked.
It’s not really a simple fix though, as the Ethernet cable is hard to unplug from where my iMac is on my desk and it’s a very inelegant solution.

After some searching for a program to deny/prevent programs from accessing the internet I found Radio Silence which is basically a firewall for outgoing connections.
Mac OS X has an inbuilt firewall, but this can prevent incoming connections. Radio Silence can prevent the opposite; outgoing connections.

I’ve tried it and it’s fixed my iTunes problem.

For $9 USD I think it’s really worth while. I’m sure there are other more complicated solutions  out there that could have solved my problem. But Radio Silence is simple to use and just works, that’s what I want.

Fast & Furious 6 review

Hands down one of the silliest movies I’ve seen in a while.
And Battleship is one of my favourite movies.
Fast & Furious 6 was very silly, so much so it pushed suspension of disbelief to breaking point and beyond.

The thing about Battleship is that it knows it’s a silly movie, it’s a movie based on a board game.
It’s got aliens in it, there’s ships, most of them aren’t battleships (spoiler; there’s only one ‘battleship’ in the movie Battleship), the rest of the ships in Battleship are destroyers or other sorts of vessels.
Actually all this information is given in quite a simple way with a bit of footage and a short bit of dialogue so you understand the difference between a destroyer and a battleship. It doesn’t however impart the difference between a boat and a ship. But generally you can put a boat on a ship but you can’t put a ship on a boat.

Returning to the topic for a moment....
I watched this on blu-ray, and used the fast forward button more than a few times, it was the only way to get through this movie, (even my favourite movie Battleship I usually skip through the soccer scene at the start).

Fast & Furious 6 carries so much baggage from the previous films that its title/opening credits sequence serves as a “Previously on” for the movie.
Small mercies at least it wasn’t a character having a flashback sequence of all the salient events of the previous movies, that would have been worse, even more so if it included a voice over.

Fast & Furious 6 takes itself too seriously and it’s a film that shouldn’t be serious it should be a movie that knows it’s a bit silly, or at least know that what they’re up to is at least a bit silly. Aside from one mention of ‘James Bond shit’ there’s no acknowledgement that the events within the movie are practically impossible and outside the bounds of ‘normal’.

The setting for most of Fast & Furious 6 was London.
Maybe they were running out of interesting locations to shoot. My first thought was that there was some sort of money deal that meant they could shoot there. But skipping through the Wikipedia article for Fast & Furious 6 there doesn’t seem to be the word “concession” used anywhere in the article. “Tax” is used once in relation to them shooting in the Canary Islands who gave a tax rebate of 38%.

The early ‘Fast and Furious’ movies were a fun mix of fast cars, soundtrack and vaguely good looking people doing stuff in a vaguely real way. This movie just smashes a lot of the suspension of disbelief out of the way. It’s definitely not helped by the way it treats physics. Optimistically I would say that physics are treated in a cartoon fashion. But it’s the way they play it so very straight whenever they ignore the laws of physics. There are jumps and catches mid air and then when they land it’s against a car’s windscreen or something.
I probably would have had less problem with it if they had some of the characters, after having done this do the movie-style thing of coughing up or spitting out some blood. Giving you some vague indication that they were hurt rather than just shrugging.

With Fast & Furious 6 I just couldn’t help while watching the scenes in London, just thinking, that The Italian Job, the original 1969 one not the really quite awful other film from 2003 also of the same name, that was the best car heist film. It’s got everything in it, some great quotable dialogue, some great uses of cars. Iconic cars at that; Minis.

Also, I never really noticed how god-y Fast and Furious 6 is. Maybe I never really noticed it in the previous films, but there’s a fair amount of god-related stuff in the films which could have been avoided, so it was obviously a deliberate choice to have them in there.

Finally. I didn’t like any of the characters in this film.
Some like Dwayne Johnson (aka The Rock) playing Hobbs I couldn’t work out why he was in the movie. I seem to recall he was in the last one. Johnson is cartoon like in his presence on screen, and that’a against Vin Diesel who is also almost cartoon like. Both are buffed up, except Johnson is too much, just him being in a scene throws out any believability.

Going back to Battleship, with its silliness, basic plot and lots of explosions and big soundtrack with AC/DC on it, it makes you understand and like the characters very quickly.
It’s quite economical with how it establishes everything (even if there’s a soccer match at the start which wastes about 10 minutes of the movie). Most of the characters in Battleship are likeable, there’s moderately interesting and you kinda care about them.
I didn’t really care about any of the characters in this movie, the biggest emotive response I had to the characters was fining them irritating.

Double finally, as all movies seem to have a post-credits sequence then I’ll write a final paragraph after ‘finally’. Things that make little sense; Paul Walker’s character flying back from London to the US to be locked jail up to find out information that could probably have come to the characters with some hand waving and tech-related sort of scenes in London. Location choices; RAF Bentwaters standing in for NATO base in Lusitania, Spain. I recognised this one because it’s been used on Top Gear. It’s also only shown on an overcast day and at night. If it weren’t for the onscreen graphics you wouldn’t know where it was (ok, fine there was dialogue indicating that the characters were going to Spain). That overcast day could and should have been either re-shot on a sunnier day or had the sky repainted to make it look sunnier. There’s enough movie short hand that exist that says Spain = sunny. Not overcast. Even in a moody military scene involving NATO Spain it should have been sunny, otherwise it could have been anywhere.

Girt - The Unauthorised History of Australia review

“Australia owes its existence to tea, tax evasion, criminals and cannabis. With these four sturdy pillars as its foundation, what could possibly go wrong?”Girt - The Unauthorised History of Australia By David Hunt, pg.96

This book grabbed my attention because of its title Girt. As the name of this blog shows it’s a word a rather like and think should be used more often. Surrounded is such a long word and in many (fine a few) situations girt could be used. Of course, then to anyone outside of Australia you’d need to explain to them what “girt” means, but language should be used, it’s in the Australian anthem and should be used in more places than just “Advance Australia Fair”.

I was quite surprised by Girt, by its humour and what I learnt from it.
In short it makes early Australian history funny and interesting via the characters of history.

The tone of Girt is relatively light and the footnotes make it slightly comedic. The footnotes that are on almost every page are a sort of commentary of the text itself.

Girt is also fully indexed, which was something of a surprise that it was when I reached the end. So I imagine that university students when needing something to liven up an essay about Australian history can turn to Girt to fill up their reference list.

Girt was incredibly easy to read, with each chapter easily flowing into the next and everything told in vivid and amusing detail.
From Girt I have learnt the etymology of the word ‘grog’, who Trim was and that Bligh was a bastard who no one liked.

There are excerpts from letters throughout the book that help further illustrate the people that it covers and illuminate their thoughts and psychology a bit more than the writer’s commentary provides.

Some of the history in Girt I recognised, having learnt it in the long since past history lessons in primary and high school, but Girt really brought to life the characters of Australia’s history. Whilst reading Girt I felt more like I knew the men (and occasionally women) of history that fill the book (and history) and that should anyone mention Macarthur, Bligh, Major Ross, Bass and Flinders or Macquarie something that I’ve read in Girt will be conjured in my memory.

I hope that David Hunt has plans afoot for a second volume continuing to look at Australia’s history, continuing on from where Girt finishes.

Melbourne Leisurefest 2013

Today (Thursday 3rd October 2013) I visited the Melbourne Leisurefest 2013 at Sandown Racecourse, it’s still on another few days until Sunday 6th October 2013.

Interesting point, getting there. I drove there by driving North up Springvale Road. You would usually turn right after the rail crossing in Springvale and drive down Sandown Road to get to the Racecourse of the same name. Except the council (or whoever) is doing road works so no right turn there. Instead you have to turn right at the next road up.

This is Virginia Street and it’s quite unsuited to taking any traffic for a big event; it’s normal width suburban street and it’s got cars on either side dropping the road down to one lane with areas where you have to pull over to let a vehicle going in the opposite direction pass. At the end of Virginia Street it becomes Bird Street, at the end of Bird Street there’s a gate to allow you onto Racecourse Drive for when something’s on.

However, there is a gap between Bird Street and Racecourse Road, that gap is dirt, and that’s probably fine for most of the year. Bird Street probably doesn’t get a lot of traffic because Sandown Road would take the traffic so no one would need to worry about the 800 millimetre gap of dirt between the two pieces of tarmac.

Except that’s it’s been a particularly wet few days in Melbourne and while Thursday wasn’t particularly wet it wasn’t sunny enough to have dried out anything.

So this section of what had once been dirt was now quite muddy.

But that’s fine, because I was driving a 4x4. But as I drove onto it in preparation to turn right I notice a bit of dip down, and I think anyone driving out of Bird Street in something like a regular car might not get out of that muddy section quite so easily.

Unlike some of my previous expo outings this one I didn’t just go out of curiosity, I’ve in fact been to this one like it before, so know what it looks like. I actually went with a purpose, or several actually.

Before finding out the things I had actually gone to the Leisurefest to find out I did have a bit of meander around the Melbourne Leisurefest. It’s “The Official Industry Show” proclaims the free show guide that you get when you hand over your $15 cash to get in (concession and seniors get in for $10 and children under 15 get in free with an adult).

There were lots of caravans on display and they’re something I have little interest in, I don’t want to ever tow a caravan, I have no interest in owning one and with some exceptions they’re all more or less the same.

Some of the really rugged ones are peripherally interesting to me in that they look like they’re built to survive an apocalypse.

I did walk past several camper trailers which are interesting, they’re kinda like several steps down from a caravan. They’ve got storage and cooking stuff build in, plus a sink and even water heating and things like that, but instead of a bed and all being enclosed and everything there’s a tent that folds out. The key advantage of a camper trailer is weight and manoeuvrability. You can tow a camper trailers and go off four wheel driving in a way you can’t with a caravan, even the rugged ones, because caravans are heavy. There’s a reason people towing caravans are in the left hand lane doing just under the speed limit, caravans are heavy things that don’t like to go around corners or go at speed.

I also saw one camper trailer variant which was actually a tool box sort of arrangement that sits on the back of a ute. I’ve seen these sorts of arrangements before, but on the back or built onto a ute tray. This one was built onto a ute with a tub, without any apparent modifications to the ute’s tub to take it.

This was made by M2O Toolbox & Canopy. I thought this was a great idea, this at least gets rid of the need for a camper trailer. If you’ve of course got a ute to add something like this to.

Weight would still be an issue for me. Though for M2O this appears to be their business; making toolboxes and canopies for utes so they would know how much weight is good okay and where the threshold lies.

I also had a look in the ARB tent and was rewarded with a showbag, which was one of those bags with the long handles that no one seemed know how to hold onto. Everyone seemingly bunching it up to carry it like a shopping bag. The way I carried it was swinging it round onto my back like a messenger bag.

I’ve only actually looked through the showbag now as I write this up. Within the bag is a copy of 4WD Touring Australia “Living the Dream” proclaims the under title, it’s “The Exploration Issue”. There’s the ARM 4X4 Accessories catalogue, notable for its shiny and slightly rough front cover with what is trying to be tactile sand on the front. 7 ARB stickers including; Safari Snorkel,ARB Sport, 2 kids ARB stickers, an ARB Dandenong Sticker, Old Emu 4X4 Suspension by ARB and Airlocker ARB. There’s also a pamphlet for ARB Dandenong and Issue 37 of ARB’s own magazine 4X4 Action, which is full of articles and adverts pretty much like any other magazine. Except this one’s produced by ARB.

Curious to know what ARB stands for? It’s on their website, it’s the initials of the company’s founder Anthony Ronald Brown.

Next I arrived in an area I was actually interested in; where all the four wheel drive clubs had decided to locate themselves.

I didn’t find a club I wanted specifically to join, but while talking with the Four Wheel Drive Victoria bloke he mentioned that vehicle specific clubs were taking members from non-related vehicles. So the Jeep club was accepting members who had vehicles that weren’t Jeeps.

That would be a kinda uncomfortable meeting to go to being the only person who didn’t have a Jeep. Jeep people are also a bit fanatical about their Jeeps. Wranglers especially.

I did grab a pamphlet about 4X4 Driving Training which looked interesting.

Only on closer inspection does it seem more interesting than just before I slipped it into my ARB showbag.

On one panel of the found out pamphlet it asked “Just purchased a four-wheel drive vehicle?” Then follows it up with “Are you aware of the responsibilities that come with owning a four-wheel drive vehicle”?”

Then it asks a bunch of questions like;

  • Do you know how to drive it?

  • How to make the best of you gears?

  • The different techniques needed to be able to drive competently in sand, mud, and other terrains while maintaining traction at all times?

  • How to drive it in the best interests of the environment and other bush users?

  • Are you thinking of putting some accessories on your vehicle? Driving lights, tyres, bull bar, winch, UHF radio, HF radio or suspension?

  • Will your choices be best for your vehicle?

  • Do you know where to go four-wheel driving?

It then says “If you answered NO to any of these questions then a Four-Wheel Drive Victoria Training Course is your best answer to getting into the four-wheel drive scene safely and responsibly.”

Now. Just think and look at the question it asks at the end in relation to the bullet pointed questions.

If you answer NO to the UHF radio question; NO I’m not thinking about putting accessories on my vehicle, then I should go for the training course. Uh...no, that’s not right.

The other questions do stand up against the final question, but the UHF accessories question doesn’t. Because you need to answer YES to that question in order for the final question to make sense, “YES I am thinking about putting accessories on my vehicle and I want help”.

If you answer NO to adding accessories then...well that’s it you don’t need to worry yourself about them.

Satellite phone have come down in price quite a ways.

I still wouldn’t call them cheap, but they’re certainly not stratospheric in price of what they once were. They were once things that sat in heavily protected Pelican cases that were chunky, robust and amazingly expensive pieces of technology.

They’re still that, sort of.

MGLSAT who were at the Leisurefest and even have a show room in Victoria, but mostly it seems operate from their website had two phones on offer. Provided by two different companies / satellite systems. Inmarsat and Iridium.

The latter many people will likely be familiar with. They’re the ones who were the first in portable civilian satellite phones. These phones have pole to pole coverage. Basically anywhere you can see sky these will work.

They’re also expensive, not gigantically expensive, but expensive compared to the alternative. The Iridium 9575 costs $1600. For what kinda looks like a 90s era Nokia. It’s dust and water resistant to IP65 works from -15 to + 65 ºC has a talk time of 4 hours (standby of 30 hours).

The other option is the inmarsat IsatPhone Pro. It costs $900.

Inmarsat doesn’t quite have the same coverage as Iridium does, but unless you’re a polar explorer it shouldn’t be a problem. The Inmarsat has global excluding the poles coverage. They achieve this by using 3 satellites compared to Iridium’s 66. Why these two companies and how they manage these two different amounts of satellites can be discovered from their Wikipedia pages.

Basically Inmarsat’s coverage misses out on most of Greenland, what appears to be most of Alaska and the aforementioned poles, although right up to the general area of the poles’ landmasses you might get coverage.

The relevant part of this is that Australia is in the middle of the I-4 Asia Pacific satellite coverage area, which means if you’re intending to use it whilst travelling around Australia it’s perfect.

The IsatPhone Pro does have a few different features than the Iridium 9575. The IsatPhone Pro is dust and water resistant at IP54, it’s got 8 hours talk time (100 hours standby), works from -20 to + 55 ºC and has Bluetooth. It looks like an early 2000s Nokia.

It’s got a bigger screen than the Iridium can manage faster data (up to 20kbps compared to Iridium’s up to 9.6 kbps) and it also cheaper.

There is the question of why anyone would get the Iridium? Well...it’s better for some things than Inmarsat’s offering. Mostly if you’re a miner or possibly a farmer or something like that. The Iridium is ‘always on’ and you can push an emergency button SOS button, you can also be contacted on it without extending the aerial. While the Inmarsat IsatPhone Pro you have to fold out the chunky aerial from the body and get a satellite lock before making a call.

I did actually go wanting to know about the price and features of these phones so did ask questions and found out this info. When I do eventually get a satellite phone (more because my family want me to have one) it’ll likely be the Inmarsat IsatPhone Pro. The price being the primary driver on that one, it’s cheaper than most smart phones and can do more when you need it than a smart phone.

Now of course there are other options for satellite phones, you can get cases that your smart phone clips into that, via an app gives the same options as the above two phones. These clip on cases contain all the satellite phone technology without the speaker, mic and other innards. They’re also not much cheaper than the IsatPhone Pro.

The other reason I was at the Melbourne Leisurefest was to investigate swags. I do mean in the plural and singular though not “swag” as in “swagger” which is how it’s been used of late.

Rather swag with the Australian definition a bedroll for camping, though it’s also evolved a bit from a bit of canvas that you crawl under to something with a few aluminium poles curved around to keep it off your face.

Why a swag?

Well I’m lazy, but also want to sleep outside in the bush and I find tents a little...meh.

If you look at a tent, even one of those round 3 second tents that’s not the end of the setting up, you have to fill your tent with something. Something to sleep on, and something to sleep in. Be it a foam pad or an inflatable sleeping mat and then a sleeping bag.

A swag has all of those things, it’s a thing to sleep within, it’s got a foam mattress and, well you can have a sleeping bag within it, or just a blanket.

Southern Cross Canvas

It’s made out of canvass which is a little old world, but is practical, will keep you warm and has many flaps and mesh that you can open to keep you cool.

My question, that I put to the person at Southern Cross Canvas was a pretty simple one ‘why should I buy from you when there are cheaper swags out there, at this very fest?’.

The answer was pretty simple, they use Australian made materials (except the aluminium poles which are American) and it’s all Made in Australia. Made in Bayswater in fact.

The others which are much, much cheaper are made in China or India and are treated with various chemicals to make them waterproof or to try and make them mimic their ones.

They actually had me at Made in Australia, I’m a firm supporter of buying stuff that’s made in Australia and supporting local industries.

I did sit, and lie down in the swag they had on display and the person from Southern Cross Canvas observed that it was only just long enough for me (I’m 6ft 1” or 6ft 2” something like that) pretty much okay for it, but they said that they could custom make a longer one for me. For about $20 more than the special price for the show.

And yes, I did order one there and then. Though I did go to the show with the intent of finding out about one, and the offer of the custom made one did push me over the line that this would be something actually constructed for me, being a bit taller than the average.

Finally, would you like a Dyson Air Multiplier, but they’re too expensive? Would you like something that’s cheaper and runs on 12 volts? Then you need the Air O Sonic 12 Volt Bladeless Fan! Available from Award RV Superstore for only $149.00.

OzKinkFest Fetish Expo 2013


Fitzroy Town Hall - 21st September 2013

Fitzroy Town Hall, feeling slightly over dressed.
I had considered wearing a long western duster-style coat that I have worn and do on occasion continue to wear. It’s long and very dramatic when the wind is in front of me and can make it billow.
I didn’t, as it was forecast to be warm-ish and I mostly wanted to wear a t-shirt and a light jacket and my western duster coat isn’t as light as it appears (usually when it billows).

I attended the OzKinkFest Fetish Expo because I’m curious about expos, and curious in general. I’m willing to go and see and learn, find out stuff.

The most interesting thing from attending the Fetish Expo was, not surprisingly the people who attended.
I wasn’t the only person who was noticing they were overdressed. Two guys behind me in the queue to get tickets were also worried, with one of them saying to his friend “well take your shirt off if you’re worried”.
He then commented “I would have worn my leather pants if they still fitted”.
Considering it was drifting up to 21 degrees on the day I think it was borderline being able to be comfortable for wearing any large amount of leather without sweating a lot.
There were some people who were cross dressers, whom I only really noticed because they had heels on and were taller than me, I’m 183 cm (or 6ft), so not exactly short. But these ladies were rather taller than me, it was interesting, and something that while I noticed still took me a moment or two to work through why they might be taller than me.

There was one piece of body language exhibited from the couples that were there that I found particularly noticeable. It was something I noted while watching a brief bit of cabaret, of the audience watching, and then when I began to wander around noticed it from more people.
It was the rubbing or patting of partner’s backs. More so men doing it to their female partner’s backs.
It was an fascinating quirk that a lot of people seemed to be exhibiting, enough that I noticed it was I wandered around.
I did start to wonder if it’s just a particular quirk of couples in general, that the man in these sorts of situations needs to do something with his hands.
Or maybe it was an somewhat unconscious thing, considering the role-differentials that were at play at the expo they were layering their partners with their presence. I’m not sure.

As for the actual stalls within the expo, there were broadly 4 different stalls, those presenting or selling; outfits, clothing and costumes, these included some leather corsets, various outfits made out of leather, vinyl or rubber. Then there were an assortment of leather cuffs, collars and other accessories like that, within this broad-ish category there were also stalls presenting bondage equipment like ropes, beds and torture-esque-looking stands and equipment.
There were several stalls selling paddles and whips.
Finally there were 2-3 stalls selling books, including one who was the author signing copies of her book “Catalyst - Stories of Awakening”. I won’t try to summarise it except to say that the reviews on Amazon say that it’s “good erotica” and it appears to be much better than “50 Shades of Grey”.

First up the clothing element to the Fetish Expo.
There wasn’t anything overly surprising in this element of the expo, as mentioned above there was a lot of vinyl, some leather and some other things. A catalogue of available costumes at one stall revealed nothing overly surprising. I would term it as fetish, but only in the very broad sense of the term, costumes based on various domestic industry employments.
The cuffs, collars and other things like that presented something a little more interesting as with these smaller items there is more a sense of craftsmanship about them, these, like the paddles, whips and other items you get a sense these have been designed by people who are within the scene.

This is in fact true of most of the things at the Fetish Expo, they all have a sense of being an industry, albeit small and specialised. Most of the items appear very well crafted and have been crafted and designed by people who know what they want and think they know what others would need or want.

One other interesting thing about most of these stalls was the prevalence of women in the main role. I don’t want to say domineering or even power role, but there were at least a couple of men manning stalls with women. The men were in string-vests or sleeveless vests or something like that while the women were dressed, not ordinarily, but in a standard sort of way. Calmly confident.
The men who were on a more equal footing, well the only one I really noticed was a cross dressing man. She / He (I’m not sure on this gendering here as I’ll explain), was dressed in a costume nurses’ uniform sort of styled sort of thing. Unlike one or two of the other ladies around this outfit seemed more of a caricature of a lady than those others.
This one of the things I found fascinating whilst being there, the power balances between the people there and how to read them.
The cues that when we’re out in about to read off of are skewed quite a bit so it’s sometimes not apparent and a first reading isn’t right.

I looked at this lady and her and her partner’s stall missemm, which was paddles and canes. Very nice paddles in fact.
The most surprising thing I noticed when I picked up the paddle was how light the paddles were. These were wooden paddles, but very light, even the larger ones were very light. One that I handles felt like it didn’t weigh anything.
You’d think that paddles, to use in that sort of BDSM sort of play would need to have some weight to them, but no. Some of these were incredibly light.
They were also very well finished.
I’d like a piece of furniture made out of some of these timbers.

The fetish / bondage bed was actually rather nice looking, some tasteful shackles and hoops through which to have your ropes go and storage around the four pillars (it was a four poster bed). However it was a rather dark wood / dark stain that was applied to the wood. It was the sort of piece of bedroom furniture that you could have in any regular vanilla house and unless you thought about it would be difficult on first look to think that it could be used for such predilections.

Whilst in the Fetish Expo I also spoke with the member from the Australian Sex Party, whom I learned was also the candidate for Dunkley (my electorate) so had a short chat with her about the election.

Finally within the Expo there were a few stalls selling books, these weren’t really interesting to me, not because I don’t find the texts interesting, as mentioned throughout I find most things interesting, if only out of curiosity. There was one large stall that was from Polyester Books, which I have visited before and purchased book from in the past. So I’ve had a chance to peruse their shelves, looking at not only the subjects that they decided to bring to display at the Fetish Expo but their whole range of books and other items they have on sale at their shop in Brunswick Street.

Finally and what I probably should have started with, but it’s more of a subject on its own was what I was given after I’d paid my fee to get in. That was, a show bag.
The show bag has obviously been sponsored by http://www.adultretailfinder.com.au/ as within the show bag is a branded dildo and “Sex Love Time Vibrator” plus a hot pink “Plain Colored Wrist Belt”.
Inside the show bag were also 3 copies of Kink-E Magazine along with some advertising and business cards for businesses that weren’t at the Fetish Expo and ones that were.
One piece of advertising material did catch my eye this was Fetish House ‘Purveyors of Fetish, Fantasy, BDSM, Kink, Dominance & Submission, Dungeons, Roleplay & Cross Dressing etc, etc. Supreme Mistresses & Masters, Obedient Submissives, Adventurous Fantasy Girls’.
They’re in an industrial/commercial estate in Oakleigh and are a fetish business that is “licensed and legal, and conform to all Health Department regulations.” which is nice to know.
I don’t find it at all surprising that something like this is in an industrial estate, a lot of sex-based businesses are.
Usually their being in these locations is down to planning laws. You can’t be within X meters of a school and the NIMBY argument comes into play and industrial estates are the only places away from such concerns. They’re also buildings that are concrete boxes and therefore customisable.
But I digress.
Fetish House’s website is interesting and somewhat surprising. Though I shouldn’t be, it’s something I’ve probably assumed existed. That it actually does exist with such a detailed list of services in itself is enlightening to what they offer.

Whilst wandering around the Fetish Expo I wasn’t tempted to purchase anything, though I didn’t actually go there expecting to purchase anything. Being there did make me more aware of how many people of diverse ages were into the broad ‘fetish’ scene.
There were some people who were at least 60+ who had purchased some items and busily looking at other things when I walked past them.
It was fascinating to see the varied people and diversity that’s present at an expo like this, and there’s something that’s rather more honest and true about all of this. Compared to Sexpo (another expo I’ve attended in the past) which was, compared to the Fetish Expo a rather commercial and somewhat soulless affair. The Fetish Expo is quirky, odd, weird but all the people there know what they’re talking about, know how to handle their products and have a passion for their lifestyle and world.

Splendid Chaps - Nine/Women

15th September 2013

A version of Britney Spears' 'Toxic' read William Shatner / Jon Pertwee spoken word-style performance by John Richards with Petra Elliot providing the chorus was much better, funnier than an acapella version that they had planned.

I also hate noisy fans.

Welcome to Nine / Women.

I also don't really like Rose Tyler.

So it was a somewhat relief that not *all* of the podcast recording was devoted to Rose Tyler.

There was some discussion of the gender politics in Doctor Who which I do find interesting. Gender politics in television media interests me full stop.
There's I think it's called the Bechdel test that you can apply to a TV show, which basically looks at a scene with two women in it who talk to each other about something other than a man.

Doctor Who, when there are two women in a scene usually does remarkably well with this test. It would probably do amazingly well if you excluded the Doctor from the definition of a male.

New Who was discussed in this recording a lot more than classic Who. Though Barbara Wright was mentioned and chatted about between Ben and John before the guests came on stage.

I did find it interesting how Celeste Liddle came into Doctor Who - via Torchwood, which is an interesting way to find your way into Doctor Who. Considering that Torchhwood is a pretty gender diverse show. There's pan-sexual Jack Harkness, Ianto Jones apparently straight (he has/had a girlfriend who got Cyber-converted), Owen Harper, Toshiko Sato and Gwen Cooper. Gwen is the only one of the main cast that's firmly straight and has a boyfriend and then also has a wedding to him.
In the first episode Owen is both a possibly rapist and also probably bisexual or at the very least not gender fixed. It depends how you read the first episode, but basically he uses an alien spray to make a woman attracted to him, but she clearly has no interest in him (and has a boyfriend), then he uses the magic spray and she (and her boyfriend) are altered in their attraction and become attracted to him.
Incidentally there's also another reading that suggests rape and that's between the Master and his wife Lucy. It depends on how you read the situation, but there is at the very least assault and very likely sexual, though maybe not penetrative assault. He's clearly hypnotised her, but when she's on the Valiant she also has been physically abused. She also kills him.
Back to Torchwood, Toshiko also has a fluid sexuality and gets into a relationship with a woman who's actually an alien.

Going from the broad Torchwood to Doctor Who is something of a step backwards in many ways.

There was a lot of discussion of Rose Tyler, a character who I’ve never really liked. The panel made the comment that it’s the fault of some writing and even some lines.  Tansy Rayner Roberts especially saying that when she watched episodes she just ‘mentally edited’ out the lines that were particularly bad or negative to the character.
I’m not like that however, for me what’s there on screen (or in print or on audio) is what that character says.
So I can never really shake the ‘clawing eyes out’ scene (as they called it at the podcast recording) between Rose an Sarah Jane Smith in School Reunion. It was just such a selfish scene for Rose. The scene that’s similar when Donna and Martha meet where it’s friendly and fun was how that scene should have happened.
But in School Reunion it just made Rose seem petulant and childish.

Of School Reunion it was also discussed the way that it slightly retconned Sarah Jane Smith’s relationship with the Doctor. That idea that she had put her life on hold, waiting, almost pining for the Doctor to return, which was unnecessary. That she would measure herself against him in that way.
The novels and audios have in any case filled in that, Sarah had a rich and exciting life before and after ‘School Reunion’ so what happens in that story is more the odd one out of how the series has dealt with her character.

The women on the panel did raise something interesting that I’d not considered before and that was that the Ninth Doctor treats Rose much like an abusive partner.
Looking back on how the Ninth Doctor is towards Rose and to a lesser extent Adam Mitchell there is a surprising amount of abuse levelled at them by the Ninth Doctor.

Freema Agyeman and her character of Martha Jones was also discussed. That the decision to have the Tenth Doctor seemingly continuously comparing her to Rose Tyler was a mistake and that it lessened her presence on the show and within the TARDIS.
Additionally the character of Martha Jones was inconsistently written, with her early episodes being quite strong but later in the series, or perhaps in the shooting schedule she was less able to fight to keep more of Martha’s character in the episodes.


Further along the nature of 'companions' was discussed, how that the term 'companion' is somewhat meta-referencing, not just the show itself but the fandom that's arisen. Pre-1989 the term 'companion' wasn't used very often asserted Ben McKenzie. That the Big Finish Productions audios have added to this, often using the term ‘companion’ and that it was was something that’s only really started since Doctor Who’s become more aware of itself and the fans and I suppose its audience.
Before 1989 they were the Doctor's 'friends' or during the 1970s his assistants. Which basically means Liz Shaw and Jo Grant. Sarah Jane Smith didn't really become his assistant in the laboratory work sort of way.

The lack of female writers in New Who was also raised. Even in classic Who there wasn't exactly a huge amount of female writers. Though there were women behind the scenes; Verity Lambert and Delia Derbyshire are two notable names from early in the show's history (right at the start). It seemed back then the BBC were more for experimenting, but now they're somewhat less so. Only Helen Raynor has written for the series and Daleks in Manhattan was one of those stories. The very quite bad Daleks in Manhattan.

Finally the question of a female Doctor was raised. Everyone seemed to think it was a good idea.
I disagree, and slightly agree with their reasoning.
If the show was to be rebooted, go right back to the start and reboot the show with a new lore and whatever, then sure, make the Doctor female. Alternatively when we get to the magical thirteenth incarnation of the Doctor, potentially his last life, depending on which bit of continuity you follow, then sure, do a soft reboot and start the regenerations again as a woman.

But just introducing a female Doctor in because of some wish for a female Doctor...no.
I think just regenerating the Doctor into a woman to have a woman for the sake of it cheapens it and diminishes the role of women in Doctor Who.

The Doctor has had female equals and should continue to have. Many of the companions have been presented as equally capable as the Doctor. Liz Shaw (played by Caroline John) was just as much a scientist as the Doctor was, and was replaced by Jo Grant because in the words of the Brigadier the Doctor doesn’t need a scientist he needs someone ‘to hold test tubes and tell him how brilliant he is’.
Romana (played by Mary Tamm and Lalla Ward) was presented as the Doctor’s equal, quite literally, being a Time Lady.
Sarah Jane Smith illustrates this as being beyond an equal of the Doctor by actually sustaining a whole other series ‘The Sarah Jane Adventures’ spun off from her appearance in ‘School Reunion’.
The Tenth and Eleventh Doctors even appearing in episodes of ‘The Sarah Jane Adventures’.
One argument I've read against the call for a female Doctor is there's no big calls for a female Superman; a female Batman; a female The Hulk or a female equivalent of Thor.
These are all fairly mythic, comic-style characters, that is more or less what the Doctor is. He's been around for 50 years (although an argument from history isn't a justification in and of itself) but the character of the Doctor as a male wanderer in time and space is something that's been established, it is a part of the show's mythos. Changing his gender because 'it's time we had one' isn't enough. The universe in which he exists should change, he should gain equals or even betters rather than have his being, his character be changed to accommodate what we feel should be done or what we should have.

To end, and return to my first point, vocal fans.
This and indeed all the other recordings were *recordings* they’re podcast recordings.
You don’t need to be shining your sonic screwdriver with its sound effect all the time, as Ben McKenzie said there’s already enough sound and feedback on the mics without you adding that in.
Also, talking during the recording. The guy in front of me actually asked the vocal fans (who were seated beside me) during the break half way *not* to talk during it, which was good and something I was close to saying myself, but I mostly just slowly brewed on it rather than acting on it.

Harvey Norman - website vs in store pricing

I hate going into Harvey Norman, I hate the low false ceilings, the soft fluorescent lighting, the temperature inside their stores (always just a little slightly too warm no matter the season). Everything inside their stores makes going in just not remotely a pleasant experience.

I do on occasion however find myself needing to go into a Harvey Norman store to buy things, things that aren’t available elsewhere or that I need immediately that I could source online but cannot wait for it to be delivered.

Usually I try to avoid Harvey Norman and go to other shops like The Good Guys and JB Hi-Fi before resorting to Harvey Norman.

I also try to check online before travelling to a physical store for the item I need. JB Hi-Fi and Harvey Norman both have relatively accurate stock indicators on their sites so if it’s something that those two sell that’s the first place I look.

The item in question that I purchased today was a Belkin CarAudio Connect FM Bluetooth (http://www.belkin.com/au/p/F8M117au), this is the Australian site for Belkin and has a price below it of $109.95.

Ticketed price $129.95

Also on Harvey Norman’s site it’s also listed at $109.95.

JB Hi-Fi’s site had it listed for $110 however the store closest to me didn’t have it in stock, other wise I’d have gone there and not have worried about the 5 cents.

When I went into Harvey Norman’s store then I was more than a little surprised that it was priced at $129.95. You can see the two images here I’ve taken of the box and the price. I of course asked in store why the discrepancy, though they didn’t really say, they just gave it to me for the online price and crossed out the ticketed price. I don’t recall the last time I saw a price for an item above that of the price on a manufacturer’s website.

But to have a website price and then to have a price in-store $20 above that of your website, well it’s not really going to make anyone want to go into a physical “bricks and mortar” store is it?

Update:

After tweeting about this and mentioning @HarveyNormanAU they said that the store I bought it from had old labels. They also answered a question after that; 'would I have been charged the ticket price even if I hadn't asked about the web price?', whomever it is on the end of Harvey Norman's twitter feed says no, I'd have been charged the web price as that's the most up to date.

I'm still not entirely convinced as my experience in store didn't fill me with confidence, the guy who assisted me (and crossed out the price) didn't seem surprised and didn't offer any information about the discrepancy.

Melbourne Social Writers' Group

As mentioned in my Daleks films at the Astor blog I’ve been trying to get out and about and socialise a little more after everything that’s been going on in my life. Meetup.com is part of that throwing oneself out into the world sort of thing as I’m really not a bar / club person. Well, I haven’t been for a really long time, so it may be that it becomes one of those things that I do do. Except I’m not a huge drinker, don’t like clubbing and generally find it all a little bit uncomfortable.

The Melbourne Social Writers Group is a group that meets weekly and monthly, I don’t go to the weekly meets because I can’t be arsed going up into the city on a weekday just for a meetup like that. The monthly ones I do go to. Well, I’ve been to for the past two months.

At the meetups there’s eating, chatting and then some writing games. Three to be precise. Game 1 is usually a half hour writing game where the organiser gives us a set of objects and or possibly a scenario plus a few objects and then we’ve got to write. 
Game 2 is a shorter game of around 15 minutes and is a slightly more obscure game forcing you to write having an set point of view or possibly it’s a scenario created by a round table discussion each adding bits to the scenario.
Game 3 is a very quick story both in length (5 minutes) and in style, you have to write a fast paced story, again using a scenario, characters or setting that is provided.

I will probably post one or two of the stories I’ve written at these meetups in a mostly unaltered format. I’ll do some minor edits to them just to fix any spelling errors and other minor things like that. But I will hold myself back from doing any major edits or improvements for the first posting of the story so it’s there in raw form with along with the game scenario at the top.

Splendid Chaps - Eight/Science

11th August 2013

After intending to go to all the Splendid Chaps recordings I've missed a few here and there.
The last one I attended was "Who and Books", and before that the last Doctor-themed one was "Four/Comedy" during the Melbourne Comedy Festival. It all feels like such a long time ago, with so much stuff in between.
So it was nice to get out, laugh and see Doctor Who-based stuff.
   
As with previous podcast recordings I've been to I wished this one went on longer.
I also wish that they, (John Richards and Ben McKenzie) hadn't waffled as long about the 1996 TV movie (the only TV-based appearance of the Eighth Doctor), and yet also that they'd covered more different parts of it.

I also wish they'd spend more time on their guests; science communicator, MScGenetics student at the University of Melbourne and head editor of the Young Australian Skeptics Jack Scanlan, astrophysicist Dr Alan Duffy and science communicator Allie Ford. Scanlan, also being a podcaster at least knew how to hold himself in front of the mic of a podcast, but the others seemed to need direct questions asking of them to prompt them into speaking.

I also found the lack of attention or coverage of the "homework" (the stories they say we should watch, read of listen to prior to attending the podcast recording) somewhat disappointing, given the theme for this episode was ‘Science’. I had wanted to hear some in depth discussion about science in Doctor Who, considering how much it’s used (and abused) in the series. I was maybe expecting coverage of The Daleks, how the Daleks originally ran on static electricity perhaps. Terror of the Autons was mentioned and briefly dealt with. Four to Doomsday and its illustration of Newtonian physics was coverage quite well and I was surprised that it was seen to be accurate. Well not the Fifth Doctor being in space without a space suit, but the cricket ball action in space was accurate. The Masque of Mandragora wasn't mentioned at all, It seemed like an odd choice of story, perhaps to spark discussion of dimensions and other stuff like that. The Lazarus Experiment was also discussed from a genetics point of view. All of its science pretty wrong, to paraphrase Scanlan, what should have happened when Lazarus got into the machine was that he'd step, well flop out of the machine as a big cancerous blob.

Some people left before the musical portion at the end of the podcast could begin, and I was tempted to join them. The musical bit at end of the podcast feels a bit like a tax dodge. That it's there to fulfil some obscure piece of renting the venue or getting some tax concession or something. I think almost all the people who have gone to these podcast recordings would be totally happy if there wasn't a musical bit at the end and instead was a little more podcast recording.
The musical bit at the end of this was a performance of “In a Dream”, the music that was playing on the record player at the start and end of the TVM. The music that skips on "time". Disappointingly they didn't have a music-only version with only static / record static to play through the speakers whilst singer Hannah Pelka-Caven sang the song. It was nice, although not better than the music in the movie.

Dalek films at The Astor Theatre

On Saturday night (3rd August, 2013) I saw at The Astor Theatre the two 1960s Dalek films; Dr. Who and the Daleks and Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. Both I’ve seen multiple, closer to countless times on both VHS and DVD.

I went to see them again, in part because I have never seen them ' the big screen' before and also because, as part of my 'be more social' self-motivation thing have gotten onto meetup.com and found some people who share similar fascinations, thoughts and cultural touchstones that I do.

One of them ‘The Melbourne Sci-Fi and Fantasy Meetup Group’ had a meet for this screening of this double feature. Although several people RSVPed on the site only three actually attended, well 4 including myself.

Screenshot: Dr. Who and the Daleks (used under fair use)

It was an absolutely squally night for it with a lot of rain coming down leading up to the start and at the end of the night. I don't know about during, I was in the cinema. The rain paused long enough for me to talk to the theatre and back to my car between the downpours.

Even with only 4 people I had a good chat with the others who'd come along.

Watching the movie in a cinema with other people who also appreciate it is a new experience for me and my appreciation of these two films.

Screenshot: Dr. Who and the Daleks (used under fair use)

It was interesting to look at Dr. Who and the Daleks with a fresh perspective, as it’s a film I’ve not seen for at least 5 years, probably more than though, though the DVD has been sitting on my shelf, so I could watch it if I wished to.

With Dr. Who and the Daleks, I never really appreciated its comedy. I just mostly saw it as an adaption of the TV story upon which it's based. Even later on having read about it and knowing that the “Ian” character in the movie is there as more of a comedy role than that of a 'hero' character that the TV series Ian was.

But watching it alone the humour isn't really there for me, or rather I saw it but didn't recognise it as comedy humour.

There is a lot of slapstick humour to Ian's performance, in almost all of his scenes he is doing some simple physical comedy, usually falling over/into/onto/sitting down onto something. It seems obvious thinking on it now, but it took watching it with a group of people in a cinema to really appreciate the comedy of it, or the intended comedy.

It’s something I just didn’t really notice watching it alone and away from other people who notice (and laugh) at the comedy.

There’s also unintentional comedy in the movie that simply comes from it being a very 1960s movie. The opening titles and music is very incredibly 1960s.

Dr. Who and the Daleks is very efficient with its story telling, another thing that I never really noticed the last time I watched it.

Having somewhat recently watched The Daleks, the TV story upon which the movie is based it seems almost rushed. The TV story is 7 episode long with each running around about 25 minutes giving the story 175 minutes to run.

Dr. Who and the Daleks has a running time of 79 minutes.

Dr. Who and the Daleks is not a continuation of the TV series, instead it’s its own stand alone series, a different universe to the TV series of Doctor Who.

In what seems to be less than 5 minutes all the main characters are presented; Dr Who played by Peter Cushing the scientist who’s a bit childish (and yes his name is “Dr Who”), his granddaughter Barbara who’s probably early to mid-20s, his other graddaughter Susan (sometimes called “Susie) and Ian. Susan and Barbara are established as being quite smart with Dr Who being a bit childish through them each reading science books and Dr Who reading an Eagle comic, commenting to himself “most exciting”.

Screenshot: Dr. Who and the Daleks (used under fair use)

Only Susan really gets to show off her intelligence that’s introduced in the opening moments of the movie, Barbara, who is shown to be pretty tough (more so than Ian) isn’t shown to be quite as smart as Susan or Dr Who.

The wallpaper has owls on it. That was the other thing I noticed when watching it up on the big screen. The Whos (I guess that’s their name) have owl wallpaper.

Why Dr Who has built a time machine within a Police Box isn’t really explained. It seems to be the classic reason of “why not?”.

Nevertheless there’s the establishment of its larger within than without, some good WTF expressions from Ian played by Roy Castle.

The standout performance across both movies and individually in each is Roberta Tovey in the role of Susan.

She has to do a lot of the technical dialogue, Peter Cushing does some of the explanations of Tardis (it’s not in either film “the TARDIS” as it is in the TV series. Whenever it’s mentions it’s “we need to get back to Tardis”.) Given how much younger she is than Carole Ann Ford was in the role it’s fairly commendable what she does. She’s got a lot of dialogue with most of the major players in the first film; the Daleks, the Thals and the main cast and is convincing in it.

Screenshot: Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. (used under fair use)

In the second film Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D . Tovey’s Susan is in someways more mature than Ford’s Susan Foreman role in The Dalek Invasion of Earth. Mostly down to her age. There’s one scene in the TV story when Susan meets the rebels of London and Dortmun asks Foreman “and what do you do?” and she replies “I eat” and then giggles. Which would have been fine dialogue for Tovey’s Susan, but not for Ford’s Susan who 6 episodes later gets partnered up and left behind by the Doctor in a post-invasion-apocalyptic London.

Tovey’s Susan in Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. is actually quite mature given what happens to her and what she faces.

Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. wasn’t as much a revelation as the first film was to me.

It still has some humour, though it’s more obvious humour than the first.

It’s also a much darker story, set on a post-invasion Earth with the Daleks ruling it. Although not as grim as the TV version of the story The Dalek Invasion of Earth makes it out to be, it’s still several steps darker than the first film.

Screenshot: Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. (used under fair use)

The one thing that I noticed was the music, how much more there was of it in this film. There was music and sound effects in Dr. Who and the Daleks, in that film it was present, though not obvious. In Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. it was present and a member of the narrative; there was an obviousness to its presence in the film. It signalled scenes more so than the previous film did.

There were a few other notable things between the movies I noticed. The plunger control for Tardis, which Ian comedy falls onto in the first film is also present in the second. Not something I realised, mostly because I don’t think I’ve ever watched these films back to back.

The journey in Tardis is momentary in the first film, in keeping with the pace of that film it happens almost, though not quite instantly. In the second there is a sense of movement and travel in Tardis as they journey through time, that camera at an angle shifts from side to side as though on a boat.

At the end of Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. there is also a neat illustration of time travel, while of course the whole film presents time travel, but at the start and its end it shows one outcome – the bank robbery successful and with Tom Campbell being hit over the head seeking help in a Police Box – Tardis. In the second outcome at the end Dr Who puts him back a few minutes earlier before the robbery takes place and Campbell is able to knock out the getaway driver.

Campbell does not encounter himself, despite going back ‘before’ he encountered Tardis the first time. So it’s a little vague on some of the intricacies of time travel, but does neatly illustrate what Tardis can do.

Grief, wishes and the future

My dad has been going through his calendar / diary looking at dates, the when and where of mum’s diagnosis and illness.

I and my brother are trying to look to the future.

Mum said, not to feel guilty when she was “gone”. That was one thing she always emphasised, to go on with my life, our lives.

Dad, he’s looking into the past, trying, I think, and he’s said, sort of, to work out what else he could have done.

Near the end he was up at the Alfred twice a week, taking mum up for blood and platelet transfusions.

The thing that I constantly feel is that is isn’t fair, isn’t fair that mum’s died. That she’s gone. It isn’t fair that there’s people out there smoking, and they’re not dying, but my mum has.

I often, well I used to play the “what if” game in my mind, worry, think, feel guilt, worry some more about the what ifs of life. Think about what I could have done differently, what I wish had happened.
Now I don’t.
Now I’m trying to focus on the future.
It’s in the downtime moments where I’m not thinking that I can’t deal with things.

I guess this is grief.

I am trying to look forward. But it seems each time that I am getting used to it a road block is thrown in the way.
Mum’s memorial / funeral was one of those things.
A weird thing I’ve blogged about previously.
Experiencing it was something else.
Coffin at the front and centre.
The benches in the White Ladies area were stiff though had cushions. The White Ladies themselves were professional.
The celebrant wasn’t, got mum’s maiden name wrong. I feel like I should forgive her for that, but I don’t. She was employed to do a job, the job that she supposedly has been doing for a long time and she messed that up.

I think the whole memorial messes up the grieving process.

There’s still mum’s ashes to deal with.

Though for me she ceased to be “mum” in the hospital, where she died. Anything after that is just...I don’t know. Not.

I sometimes wish I believed in an afterlife, or in psychics or something. That I could pray and think that mum would hear me, or listen to the spirits and talk to her.
None of that’s going to happen though, none of that’s real. I can’t just magic it up.
I knew that from an early age, prayer didn’t work, there was no big higher power. There was just life, we live it and that’s it.
I accepted that when I was quite young, sometimes in early primary school or maybe earlier. I don’t really recall.

Now though, looking out into “real life” I’m...not scared. But this is real life, this is what there is.

I just wish...I don’t know, wish that we’d had more time. Despite knowing that our time was finite, that with mum’s disease it was always finite, even more finite than others, yet still I wish...something. I really don’t know.